Category Archives: Economics

To Raise Or Not To Raise?

Posted on by

European Central Bank (ECB) president Jean-Claude Trichet’s indication last Friday that eurozone interest rates are about to rise continues to make waves.

Yesterday the EU Observer had a piece indicating the Eurozone finance ministers were not amused, and today we have a retaliatory piece were Trichet explains theat the ECB is the ‘listening’ people bank, which is simply responding to citizen concern about ongoing price rises.

The FT made clear yesterday that the decision to raise just now was not going down well in Berlin, where the incoming government now faces the prospects of introducing a strict fiscal policy at a time of monetary tightening, and when the impact of the recent oil price rise is likely to be pinching the already pinched pocket of the German consumer.

Meantime, as the FT today explains, Trichet is feeling the heat, since he has come out and stated that the ” European Central Bank has no plans to implement a series of interest rates rises” (ie no US-style measured pace).

Plenty of material here for an Afoe post if I find the time later today.

Denationalise Tamiflu Immediately!

Posted on by

The title is really an ironic (if somewhat affectionate) reference to this post from Brad DeLong. Reading the news this morning, it seems that Tamiflu may not be such an unambiguously good thing as it was being made out to be:

Roche, the Swiss pharmaceutical group, on Thursday moved to reassure investors after US regulators said they would on Friday examine reports of up to 12 deaths and 75 cases of children who suffered health problems after using Tamiflu, the company’s anti-flu drug.

The US Food and Drug Administration said it was in “active communication” with regulators in Japan, the country with the widest use of Tamiflu for regular seasonal flu treatment, and where all the deaths and most of the other incidents of side-effects occurred.

I think a number of points could be made here. Firstly in this game there will be no free lunches. There are risks one way and there will be risks the other. Individuals may have to take decisions based on the best available information. Secondly, at the end of the day Tamiflu is not going to be virus-specific for any possible variant of avian flu simply because we don’t yet know the variant, so forward planning and risk assessment is inherently a complicated business here.

Lastly, when Brad said this: ” Low-probability but high-payoff projects are likely to be underfunded by the government–but properly funded by private companies willing to roll the dice. However, these ex ante considerations vanish ex post when an epidemic threatens…”, ( maybe I would say better rather than properly, but that’s a detail) – he was both right and wrong, IMHO, since the real issue which lies behind the argument is the moral hazard one. If you let the market regulate drug development, but then when you have a drug which is a big winner you immediately take it over, it isn’t clear that the market will work as well as you want it to next time round. On the other hand, governments can’t just stand back in the face of a real and present danger to their citizens. So I guess the only answer is negotiation and consensus, and maybe this consensus would include compensating those companies who are given the green light to go ‘full speed ahead’ if it turns out that – post ante – that decision was a bad one.

All in all a complex situation where prudence is indicated.

UK Growth and Inflation News

Posted on by

The UK economy is still very much hanging in the balance between going up and going down IMHO. The latest BoE growth estimates, coupled with not especially good employment numbers, and indications that inflation may be coming down (and hence interest rates may follow) has caused a noteable pressure on the pound sterling. BoE governor Mervyn King has put it like this: there are “substantial risks” both to the outlook for inflation and growth. The risks are “broadly balanced” so that the eventual outturn is ” just as likely to be stronger or weaker than the forecast”.

Inflation in the UK has fallen for the first time in more than a year, increasing the chance that the next move in interest rates will be down. The annual consumer price index, which is the Bank of England’s target measure, fell from 2.5 per cent in September to a weaker-than-expected 2.3 per cent in October, according to official figures.
Source: Financial Times

Unemployment in the UK continued to rise in October, but there was little evidence of inflationary pressure on pay as the growth in average earnings and bonuses fell slightly, according to official figures published on Wednesday. The claimant count, which measures unemployment as those out of work and claiming benefit, increased by 12,100 to 890,100 in October, the ninth consecutive month it has nudged higher.
Source: Financial Times

More Growth In The Eurozone

Posted on by

I think I’d better rephrase that: more overall growth, but a very mixed bag. In deriving aggregate numbers for the zone, four big economies really matter: Spain, France, Germany and Italy. Now each of these economies actually has different characteristics, so it is not clear what ‘the general picture’ means here.

Spain is the European economy whose current growth characteristic seem to resemble most those of the USA: above average growth (around 3.5% per annum), high dependency on housing and construction for the ‘extra growth’, high and rapidly growing private indebtedness (around 20% y-o-y) and a large current account deficit. Where Spain doesn’t resemble the US is in productivity, which has been more or less negative in recent years.

France is , as I’ve been suggesting, relatively ebullient despite the lack of all those labour reforms, and seems to be ‘on a roll’ at the moment. Driven by internal consumer demand and exports France managed an annualised 2.8% in the third quarter. Ironically, possibly France represents the big-four Eurozone economy with the most sustainable and balanced growth trajectory right now.

The German economy is growing at an unexpectedly high rate, but this extra-spurt is virtually all explained by the rapid increase in exports (helped of course by the fall in the euro).Investment, fuelled by the demand for all those exports, was also up. Meanhwile internal consumer demand is possibly even falling. (Growth in the third quarter was at an annual rate of 2.4% up from an annualised 0.8% in the second quarter).

And Italy, which as I keep mentioning is definitely now the ‘poor sister’ of the eurozone, with an identity crisis about what kind of economy it actually is, and a rapidly ageing population producing huge fiscal pressure. (On this see Morgan Stanley’s Vicenzo Guzzo yesterday). Italian growth actually bucked the trend in the third quarter and was lower than in the second quarter (dropping from a 2.8% annual rate to a 1.2% one).

All of this leaves me with the feeling: ‘Eurozone’ which eurozone?

The French Consumer Is Alive And Well

Posted on by

Some good news on the economic front to counter all that bad news on the social one. The French economy grew at an annualised rate of 2.8% in the third quarter of 2005 (or by 0.7% over the prebious quarter). Driving this growth: strong spending by French consumers. At this rate the French economy will be growing at a faster rate than the UK one in 2005.

France’s economy expanded at the fastest pace in more than a year in the third quarter, suggesting European growth is accelerating and providing central bankers leeway to raise interest rates. Gross domestic product increased 0.7 percent from the second quarter, when it rose 0.1 percent, the government said today in Paris.

In the euro region, where France accounts for about one- fifth of the economy, growth probably accelerated to about 0.4 percent in the third quarter from 0.3 percent the previous three months, the European Commission said Oct. 13. This quarter, the economy may expand 0.6 percent, it said. French consumers stepped up spending as oil prices retreated from a record and government-subsidized hiring pushed down unemployment from a 5 1/2 year high.

Getting Old Before Getting Rich

Posted on by

This is definitely about to become the new ‘meme’ about China. Actually it is reasonably valid. China’s ‘demographic shocks’ which come principally from the great famine produced at the time of the cultural revolution, and then from the subsequent one-child policy, are undoubtedly going to have significant consequences. Today UK Tory front bench spokesman on Trade and Industry David Willetts has a piece on the topic in the FT (subscription only unfortunately):

One reason for China’s stellar growth is that it is at a demographic sweet-spot. The massive reduction in infant mortality achieved by China’s barefoot doctors in the 1960s and 1970s is now yielding a surge of young workers – an extra 10m working-age adults per year. China’s challenge now is just to absorb them into the labour force. Add to that the massive population flow from the countryside and you can see why wages are low and growth is so fast. There are few pensioners and there are not many children either. The rabbit is indeed in the middle of the python.

If you are frustrated by your inability to read more, and are willing to hack it through a more academic paper on the same theme, then can I recommend “Demographic Dividend and prospects for economic development in China” by Wang Feng, of the University of California Irvine and Andrew Mason, of the University of Hawaii. The paper was presented at the recent (August 2005) UN experts meeting on ageing.

Update: New Economist has a fuller version of the Willets piece online.

Currency Volatility and Hungary

Posted on by

As I noted last week, Hungary now seems to have lost the ‘anchor’ of a 2010 eurozone entry expectation. (see also this, and this ). As I am also indicating currency markets may well be driven at the moment by a combination of interest rate yield variations and expectations of future movements, and this may lead to increasing volatility.

Now, if we assume that between the relatively calm waters of ‘eurozone closing’ and the choppy waters of swimming alone in the open sea there must be a break point somewhere, it might not be unreasonable to ask whether Hungary may not be presently in danger of crossing that imaginary thin red line? With Hungarian interest rates currently at 6% clearly growth-needs indicate a measured pace of reductions (particularly with core inflation around 1.5%) , but CA deficits and government funding deficits in the 6% to 7% range anything substantial in the way of rate reductions looks problematic. This is why ‘slipping anchor’ on the euro-docking objective could turn out to be especially problematic in Hungary’s case, in particular given the high levels of non-forint-denominated borrowing, and the potential for secondary ‘balance sheet’ effects.

More On Exchange Rates and Policy Rate Differentials

Posted on by

Morgan Stanley’s Stephen Len is obviously on the same page as I am about how the rising interest rate differential between Europe and the US is likely to drive short term currency movements:

Policy rate differentials are especially important now for the currency markets, and it pays to focus on central banks these days.

Reason 1. Global monetary paths are diverging, not converging. Among the major economies, only the US has an output gap small enough to support tightening. I doubt either the ECB or BOE will be in a position to tighten rates this year. Many now understand quantitative easing must be terminated by early next year, but no one has proposed actually raising interest rates from zero. Therefore, monetary paths are diverging, with the rest of the world having trouble keeping up with the Fed. This makes the Fed much more important for the USD than in normal times.

Reason 2. Global equity portfolios are likely to be out of balance. Since 2003, there have been massive equity flows into Euroland and Japan. Since much of these flows occurred when the USD was still in structural decline, and some of the outflows reflected fears of a USD crash, it makes sense to suspect hedge ratios are quite low on these equity outflows. With the rise in the FFR and resilient dollar, the cost of running these currency exposures is increasingly unjustifiable. The equity market cap-weighted short-term interest rate differential between the US and the major markets is now around 180 bp, and still rising. If the Fed takes the FFR to 5.0% by end-2006, the differential will reach levels last seen in 2000.

Issing Gives Inflation Warning

Posted on by

More evidence today of how the Central Bankers and their economic advisers are doing their best to sound the inflation alarm. This time it is ECB Chief Economist Otmar Issing:

European Central Bank Chief Economist Otmar Issing said a surge in oil prices may lead to higher-than- expected inflation in 2006, as the bank edges closer to raising interest rates for the first time in five years.

“Rising oil prices are not only affecting current inflation rates but they’re also overshadowing next year,” Issing said in an interview on Oct. 14 at a banking event in Frankfurt. “It can’t be ruled out that risks for price developments will deteriorate that much over the medium term that we might have to expect the annual inflation rate to slightly exceed 2 percent.”

The comments were the second in three days suggesting the bank may raise its inflation estimate of 1.9 percent for 2006. The bank projects the level this year at about 2.2 percent. ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said at a briefing after the annual meeting of the Group of 20 industrial and developing near Beijing yesterday that he can’t exclude inflation being “over and above” the bank’s 2 percent ceiling.

My view: this very much depends on the evolution of oil prices. There is little evidence of any strong impact on ‘core prices’ at this point, there is plenty of evidence of growth weakness. There is thus little justification from a purely eurozone perspective for any short term increase in interest rates, and certainly no justification whatsoever in the case of Germany.

Growth and Inflation in the UK

Posted on by

Following-up on my post earlier this week on interest rate policy I see Graham Searjeant has a piece in the Times today arguing that Mervyn King has the balance wrong between fighting inflation and stimulating growth.

In a sense I think that Searjeant is not entirely fair when he says:

Growth has become even more vital to support an ageing population. The Governor may deny responsibility. The rest of us cannot.

Evidently this is the case, but equally I am sure that Mervyn King is well aware of the fact. However since it is long term *sustainable* growth we are talking about here, and since I don’t doubt this is what he (King) is aiming at, even if his efforts, and the reasoning behind them remain obscure (and here I do think we can blame King) I really don’t think Searjeant’s point sticks in the way he wants. The issue is whether short-term growth is being needlessly sacrificed, and if so, to what?

Short-term growth is being sacrificed IMHO to the god of global imbalances, and the campaign to correct them, and it is these, and not inflation, which are King’s real target. (continued).
Continue reading →