Just a brief follow-up on yesterday’s post on Alan Greenspan. Sleeping on it I have the feeling that for blog posting I may suffer from the failing of trying to complicate things too much, or at least of trying to say too much at once.
Really there were two central themes, and since they are a little different from what most other commentators are saying it may be worth trying to drive them home.
The first point is perhaps best illustrated by this little extract from a Reuters article:
A Reuters poll of 20 of Wall Street’s top firms — primary dealers authorized by the Fed to deal directly in government securities markets — found all anticipate another quarter-percentage-point increase to 1.5 percent on Tuesday.“Given the mind-set in the markets that another increase is coming, the Fed is unlikely to wish to disrupt that expectation at this stage,” said economist Lynn Reaser of Banc of America Capital Management Inc. in St. Louis, Missouri.
“There might in fact be a greater risk to the economy in the Fed’s holding back simply because to do so would raise questions about what does the Fed know about the expansion’s health,” she added.
Now Let’s be absolutely clear: this view is totally eroneous.
Continue reading