Seeing is Believing, But Stabilising is NOT Recovering

This is one of the key points I have been hammering here on this blog for some weeks now. There is clear evidence of most economies globally “stabilising” at this point, you could even stretch it to say that the “worst is over” – since I doubt we will go back to the dreadful days of December and January (see German manufacturing PMI chart below) – when it was like someone had given a very sharp knock to the whole industrial sector with a large sledgehammer, and of course ultimately the vibrations settle down even if the damage remains.

But to go from this evident fact to drawing the conclusion that a full recovery is now in the works would be a very fast and loose use of both logic and economic theory. Production is falling less slowly (on an annual basis) and even increasing slightly (on a monthly basis) in some countries as orders can no longer simply be met from what are now very depleted inventories.

But as I suggest in this post, upping output to meet current orders is not a recovery, for the win-win dynamic to move us back into a new cycle investment activity has to increase. And on this front there is precious little actual evidence to back the more positive discourse, and indeed the data we are seeing indicate rather the contrary.

When I last wrote we did not have detailed data for Q1 GDP for the eurozone economies , so I took a look at the evidence from Japan, where investment activity slumped massively between January and March (pointing out that there was no good reason why we should expect the situation to be very different in Europe). Japanese business investment was down a record 10.4 percent year on year in the first three months, and a massive 35.5% over the last quarter.

But now we have detailed German Q1 GDP results from the Federal Statistics Office, and we find a very similar picture. Total investment was strongly down (– 7.9% quarter on quarter), while capital formation in machinery and equipment, was 16.2% lower than in the last quarter of 2008, and 19.6% lower than in the first three months of last year.

But all of that is to some extent history. Much more preoccupying – certainly for the “onward-annd-upward-we-go” thesis – is that German plant and machinery orders declined the most on record in April from a year earlier. Orders dropped an annual 58 percent, the most since data collection started in 1950, after falling an annual 35 percent in March, according to the Frankfurt-based VDMA machine makers association in a statement today. Export orders slumped 60 percent while domestic demand dropped 52 percent. So things actually seem to have deteriorated in April with respect to March. No good news this.

Especially when you read the same day an interview with Hans-Joachim Dübel – CEO of Berlin based FinPolConsult, one of the leading and few relatively independent voices in the German housing finance community – where he says: “My guess is that the Landesbanken alone will cause ultimate losses of 8-10% of German GDP, which is real money. Compare that sum with the 5% of GDP costs for the US S&L crisis”.

This entry was posted in A Fistful Of Euros, Economics and demography by Edward Hugh. Bookmark the permalink.

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".

2 thoughts on “Seeing is Believing, But Stabilising is NOT Recovering

  1. Pingback: Morning Skim: Spinning (Off) AOL - The Opinionator Blog -

  2. “Not Recovery”. Indeed a slow-down of the worsening is still worsening and not recovery. Strangely enough this logic seems to be not valid on the stock exchanges. Although the economy is still going downhill, Share prices are rising for quiet a time now, and I can’t see the reason for this. Maybe with the stock investors, as we Dutch say, “the wish is the father of the thought”. On the other hand, maybe the stock investors have founded their optimism on the basis of some data that we have not noticed, but this I strongly doubt.

Comments are closed.