Powell speaks

US Secretary of State Colin Powell has addressed the Ukrainian situation in a statement. He said the US does not accept the results of the election. Reuters has a summary (check the State Department website later for a full transcript):

Secretary of State Colin Powell said on Wednesday the United States did not accept the results of the disputed election in Ukraine as legitimate and called for immediate action.

Powell urged Ukraine’s leaders to “respond immediately” or there would be consequences in the relationship between the two countries.

His comments echo – even down to the strong warning of unspecified ‘consequences’ those made by Barroso and Solana for the EU earlier today and I think indicates that there is a lot of work going on behind the scenes so that the EU and US show a united front on this issue. As I’ve noted in the ‘Uh-oh’ post below, the signs are that there will be negotiations between the two sides (interestingly, the Kyiv Post reports that Lech Walesa is on his way to aid negotiations) and the prospect of violence is thankfully shrinking.

Update: The State Department has now made Powell’s full statement available. I’ve copied it below the fold.

SECRETARY POWELL: Good morning, everyone. A dozen years ago, Ukrainians chose freedom and independence, setting their country on a path of democracy and prosperity. The United States has been a consistent partner with Ukraine in this journey. Similarly, today the United States stands with the people of Ukraine and their effort to ensure their democratic choice.

Indeed, this is a critical moment. It is time for Ukrainian leaders to decide whether they are on the side of democracy or not, whether they respect the will of the people or not. If the Ukrainian Government does not act immediately and responsibly, there will be consequences for our relationship for Ukraine’s hopes for Euro-Atlantic integration and for individuals responsible for perpetrating fraud.

The Central Election Commission has just announced official results and declared the current prime minister the winner. We cannot accept this result as legitimate because it does not meet international standards and because there has not been an investigation of the numerous and credible reports of fraud and abuse. We have been following developments very closely and are deeply disturbed by the extensive and credible reports of fraud in the election. We call for a full review of the conduct of the election and the tallying of election results.

During the election campaign, the Ukrainian authorities at the highest level repeatedly sent a message about the importance of free and fair elections. We deeply regret that they did not take the opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to democracy and to be a model for the region and the world. It is still not too late for Ukrainian authorities to find a solution that respects the will of the Ukrainian people.

Countries around the world are watching the actions of Ukrainian leaders. We urge them to seize the moment. Both Mr. Yushenko and Mr. Yanukovych have suggested today that there may be a way to resolve this. Hopefully, this will give us a opening to find a solution.

I have spoken this morning with President Kuchma to press him to take advantage of these kinds of openings and also to caution him against the use of any kind of force against the demonstrators, and also encouraged him to use the legitimate means available to him to examine these election results and these allegations of fraud and abuse.

Also this morning I have spoken with EU Commission Chairman Barosso and with High Representative Javier Solana about the situation in Ukraine, and I can assure you that we share a common goal and perspective of the situation.

We have also been in touch with the Polish Government and support the offer of President Kwasniewski to mediate.

I have also spoken this morning to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov about the situation. I underscored our strong support for a fair investigation of the election and the absolute importance that no violence is used against the Ukrainian people.

Tomorrow is the EU-Russian summit in Europe, and I am confident this will be a subject of discussion between the EU leadership and the Russians. We call on all sides to work to achieve a fair and just outcome without the use of force. We remind the Ukrainian authorities that they bear a special responsibility not to use or incite violence.

Thank you.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, given the Russian role in the election process, do you see any negative consequences for U.S.-Russian relations in view of the fact that they have overtly support Yanukovych?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I had a good conversation with Minister Lavrov. What we are both interested in right now is finding a solution to this problem, a solution that is based on the law and using legal procedures to resolve these allegations of fraud, well-substantiated allegations from Senator Lugar and OSCE monitors and other monitors, and what we are trying to do now is to use diplomacy and use political actions to resolve this.

We’re not looking for a contest with the Russians over this. We’re looking for a way to make sure that the will of the Ukrainian people is respected and when we get an outcome that will truly reflect the desires of the Iranian* people for who their next leader should be.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, when you talk about a solution, do you think that the election was so tainted, the results so compromised, that there should be a new vote? And when you talk about consequences to the bilateral relationship, are you talking about reducing some of the about $150 million that the United States gives Ukraine each year?

SECRETARY POWELL: At the moment, we’re not taking any actions. We want to see what the ultimate results are so we’re not getting into any specifics. One suggestion that has been made is another election but there are other suggestions out there. This is the time for all alternatives to be examined, to be examined carefully, to be examined in light of the law, and hopefully, the parties acting reasonably and doing everything to avoid any use of force can find a way forward. They’ll get a lot of assistance from the European community, from the United States, from President Kwasniewski of Poland, who is playing an important role. And right now, we are looking at a way to move forward, not a way to punish or to do anything else but move forward peacefully to get a result that reflects the will of the Ukrainian people in a free and fair manner so that it can be accepted by the Ukrainian people and by the international community.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you’ve — this Department has talked in the past about the importance of allowing nations to conduct elections without outside interference. My question is, does the Ukrainian election represent an example that goes against that principle, specifically Russian interference in the process?

SECRETARY POWELL: What we stand for is free, fair, open elections, and we do not believe we have seen that in this instance, and what I would rather do is concentrate on how we get out of, and how the Ukrainians get out of the difficult situation they find themselves in. At a later time, one can talk about how we got into this situation, but right now we want to focus on how we get out of it.

12 thoughts on “Powell speaks

  1. If the reports of Russian troops being moved in country are true, then the negotiations are a sham. They are aimed to buy time to get Russian mercenary forces in place to replace unreliable security apparrati. Classic move. If you can’t trust your security forces, bring in ones you can trust. Putin wants the Russian Empire back, and looks to be trying to set it up via tributary states.

  2. I wonder how the powers that be would react to some asshole from another country saying that they did not accept the results of our elections? Is there little wonder that the majority of the citzens of the world think Americans are arrogant snobs?
    Get over yourself alreayd Mr Powell. You are history.

  3. It’s a little different, wanda, when there are huge protests against the government, widespread distrust of the electoral system, and an opposition leader unwilling to concede and willing to risk civil disobediance rather than concede.

    Forget about hypocrisy. Defend democracy and human rights and the rule of law, here at home and abroad. It’s the same fight.

  4. Wanda, I understand your point of view, but Chancellor Schr?der has said much the same thing; so has the OSCE. A lot of times beleaguered heads of state will insist that all their problems are with a particular villified foreign power. Pres. Mugabe typically does this (as if 100% of his critics were citizens of the USA and the UK); so does the KCNA of North Korea (even to the extent of blaming Washington for a critical news story on North Korea appearing on Indian TV); US supporters of the late invasion of Iraq blamed France for everything, despite the fact that the great majority of sovereign governments opposed the invasion, not merely Paris.

    The world is more complicated than that.

  5. “It’s a little different, wanda, when there are huge protests against the government, widespread distrust of the electoral system, and an opposition leader unwilling to concede and willing to risk civil disobediance rather than concede.
    Forget about hypocrisy. Defend democracy and human rights and the rule of law, here at home and abroad. It’s the same fight.”

    Sorry, but this is not about democracy, human rights and much less about rule of law.Rather this is about about the future of russian empire as a world power.Quite frankly you do not have to be Brzezinski or Kissinger to see that where Ukraine is going to wind up, if with the West or with Russia, it is going to have a substantial impact on that.Even if at the moment there is a tactical alliance of sort between USA and Russia on a few issues (es:terrorism) it is obvious that in the long term a weak and divided russian empire would be preferable if the USA wants to mantain its current preeminence (a questionable foreign policy goal, but that is besides the scope of the discussion).At the very least it would be one power less to worry about.
    Rest assured that Powell and Co are not going to lose sleep on the fairness of this election or the fate of the protesters in Kiev.The “right” outcome is all that matters to them.

  6. Marcello,

    It’s about democracy, human rights, and the rule of law to me and to other liberals. So I support the American government when they support those things and I oppose then when they oppose them. You should do the same. Simple as that.

  7. Hektor, I support the Ukrainian Democrats, and I don’t think it helps them when American imperialists make their intentions so clear to that other imperialist, Russia’s Putin – and give him the impression that Yushchenko is really a Western mole he wouldn’t be able to deal with. I don’t think Powell’s speech swayed Ukrainian authorities a bit, while the effect on Putin is not one of backing down but pushing even harder. (Regarding to what Phil Hunt suggest, I don’t think a strong warning from Powell or our European leaders will have any sway on Putin.)

  8. James R MacLean, good points; I would add Iraq before France and Iran now for the USA too, while the Ivory Coast’s Gbago vs. France also belongs on the list (then again, I did follow the events there ever since the Guei coup).

  9. Regarding Putin, let’s remember that he threw out OSCE from Kosovo when they got uneasy, and that a few days ago he denounced OSCE for criticising the results of the elections before knowing the official result (despite his own recognition of Yanukovych’s victory a day earlier). He’s not a democrat whatever Schr?der says.

  10. One last point regarding Powell: a low-key US approach would have been advisable also with a view at the at least 40% who did vote for Yanukovych, who fear American influence just as much as the other side Russian influence, if – as I’m certain we all do here on AFOE – one hopes they will accept the other side’s victory in the end.

Comments are closed.