The Georgian opposition is generally described as a loose alliance, united mainly in their distaste for current president Mikhail Saakashvili and their somewhat greater distaste for Russian domination. In the latter they are in harmony with the vast majority of Georgians, while the former is not so clear. But they are divided on many more fronts, one reason why they, collectively, do not appear quite ready for prime time.
Here’s one theme, what role foreign embassies to Georgia should play in the confrontation between the opposition and the ruling party:
Nino Burjanadze, leader of Democratic Movement-United Georgia party, called on foreign diplomats accredited in Tbilisi to react and condemn â€œillegal actionsâ€ taken by the authorities… (Civil.ge, May 21)
Levan Gachechiladze, an opposition politician, called on the western diplomats to give up â€œindifferent stanceâ€ and make â€œconcrete statementsâ€ about the crisis in Georgia, instead of only repeating â€œone word â€“ â€˜dialogueâ€™.â€ (Civil.ge, May 29)
…Opposition leaders said foreign diplomats should not involve themselves in internal politics.
â€œThis is considered as interference in domestic political processes, which they are not entitled to do,â€ said Salome Zurabishvili, Georgiaâ€™s former foreign minister and the leader of the Georgiaâ€™s Way Party, according to the Interfax news agency. (New York Times, June 15)
Maybe this is why Napoleon preferred to be opposed by coalitions?