No unsecured funding please, we’re French

The IMF Article IV report for the UK is as one would expect an interesting and data-packed read. But its messages were well-flagged in the concluding statement after the actual visit, and as the BBC’s Stephanie Flanders notes, the weight of its messages come more from the source than the content, which accords closely with the many critics of the Coalition austerity. So one has to look elsewhere for eye-openers in the report, to which we submit the above figure in Box 1, which shows US money market funding exposures to European banking systems. Note their almost complete disengagement from France over 8 months in 2011, a much sharper withdrawal than any other country (they were already out of the high debt countries before then) and on a scale that looks like Lehman proportions.

How was this done without a huge recession in France? Mostly by overseas asset dumps by French banks, but still, this looks like an impressive feat of balance sheet management given its scale. “Headwinds” is a popular phrase, but here there are in real life. Nicolas Sarkozy might wonder about his electoral outcomes had the country bank’s not been navigating these headwinds last year.

5 thoughts on “No unsecured funding please, we’re French

  1. Pingback: FT Alphaville » Further reading

  2. Pingback: Links 7/20/12 « naked capitalism

  3. Pingback: No unsecured funding please, we’re French

  4. Mathieu, those three words are irrelevant (to those who don’t know they are global liquidity standards proposed to come in 2015). They apply to all the countries in that table equally, but only one did the MMFs abandon.

    If you want to understand the real reason (though as you are French presumably you don’t). (1) Eurozone exposures lead to credit worries (note DE, NL, GB also fell) (2) FR banks had gorged themselves on cheap unstable borrowing (3) the market saw undercapitalised banks taking dangerous liquidity risks (4) Money market funds pulled out.

    Simple and true. As opposed to your lies.

Comments are closed.