<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes it&#8217;s who you don&#8217;t vote for that counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/sometimes-its-who-you-dont-vote-for-that-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/sometimes-its-who-you-dont-vote-for-that-counts/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Daws</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/sometimes-its-who-you-dont-vote-for-that-counts/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Daws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=1172#comment-7412</guid>
		<description>It's only one metric, but on the "So now who do we vote for" site, of nearly 1000 people voting, 30% claim to be voting for Respect at the next election, followed by 25% Green.  This is not, I might tentatively suggest, a reasonable strategy for defeating Blairite MPs...  I can't say I was encouraged by this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only one metric, but on the &#8220;So now who do we vote for&#8221; site, of nearly 1000 people voting, 30% claim to be voting for Respect at the next election, followed by 25% Green.  This is not, I might tentatively suggest, a reasonable strategy for defeating Blairite MPs&#8230;  I can&#8217;t say I was encouraged by this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
