<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slovakia: Hm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15288</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15288</guid>
		<description>"Btw. take a look at http://www.felvidek.ma/ and you will realize… A shame you don’t understand hungarian."

Which bit of the site are you referring to with this comment?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Btw. take a look at <a href="http://www.felvidek.ma/" rel="nofollow">http://www.felvidek.ma/</a> and you will realize… A shame you don’t understand hungarian.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which bit of the site are you referring to with this comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15287</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 01:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15287</guid>
		<description>Smer also takes full responsibility should things go wrong. I see he is backtracking on campaign promises that got him elected. 

Fico should understand that it is the Meciar voters who parked their votes with him, as a result in part of the boycott organised by the usual meddling outsiders. If he disappoints his voters he will find that these voters will turn to Meciar again. Remember that Meciar's government was really the best one ever. They had record growth rates that Dzurinda could not touch, and they didn't give away Slovakia's assets at fire sale prices, unlike Dzurinda. That, of course, is why the boycott was organised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smer also takes full responsibility should things go wrong. I see he is backtracking on campaign promises that got him elected. </p>
<p>Fico should understand that it is the Meciar voters who parked their votes with him, as a result in part of the boycott organised by the usual meddling outsiders. If he disappoints his voters he will find that these voters will turn to Meciar again. Remember that Meciar&#8217;s government was really the best one ever. They had record growth rates that Dzurinda could not touch, and they didn&#8217;t give away Slovakia&#8217;s assets at fire sale prices, unlike Dzurinda. That, of course, is why the boycott was organised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemuel kolkava</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15286</link>
		<dc:creator>lemuel kolkava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15286</guid>
		<description>"All politicians want power, or they wouldn't be in politics. A key question is whether they only want power, or whether they also want to do things with it."

Exactly. I am really scared what Fico might do with it. He  certainly doesnt have the Chinatown mentality to do "as little as possible".

"how is the Hungarian party in Slovakia handling its time out of power?"

The fact that the Hungarians have been in power since 1998 has been the main, in fact the only campaign slogan of the SNS with the "its time to get them out" slogan added for the less sharp voters. But the Hungarians have remained surprisingly scandal-free when compared with others. And they seem to be happy together, no threat of splitting or internal strife. Anyway, after they so shamlessly threw themselves at Fico in hope of keeping the SNS out of power, unsuccesfully, they dont seem to have any regrets about it - unlike the Christian Democrats, who as you mentioned, are still confused over the fact that morality and politics dont go together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All politicians want power, or they wouldn&#8217;t be in politics. A key question is whether they only want power, or whether they also want to do things with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. I am really scared what Fico might do with it. He  certainly doesnt have the Chinatown mentality to do &#8220;as little as possible&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;how is the Hungarian party in Slovakia handling its time out of power?&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact that the Hungarians have been in power since 1998 has been the main, in fact the only campaign slogan of the SNS with the &#8220;its time to get them out&#8221; slogan added for the less sharp voters. But the Hungarians have remained surprisingly scandal-free when compared with others. And they seem to be happy together, no threat of splitting or internal strife. Anyway, after they so shamlessly threw themselves at Fico in hope of keeping the SNS out of power, unsuccesfully, they dont seem to have any regrets about it - unlike the Christian Democrats, who as you mentioned, are still confused over the fact that morality and politics dont go together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug (not Muir)</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15285</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug (not Muir)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15285</guid>
		<description>I was going to say that statistically speaking there are no Germans in Romania anymore, but that didn't sound very nice. Thanks for filling me in on the one-per-minority seat. Any chance of the Szekely agitating for one on the grounds that they are not Magyar?

Klaus Johannis, yes, I remember now. Interesting case.

Agree with the final point. Though it's not unlikely that a one-party situation will produce factional in-fighting. If there's something like competitive primaries, the effect may be similar to two-party or multi-party systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that statistically speaking there are no Germans in Romania anymore, but that didn&#8217;t sound very nice. Thanks for filling me in on the one-per-minority seat. Any chance of the Szekely agitating for one on the grounds that they are not Magyar?</p>
<p>Klaus Johannis, yes, I remember now. Interesting case.</p>
<p>Agree with the final point. Though it&#8217;s not unlikely that a one-party situation will produce factional in-fighting. If there&#8217;s something like competitive primaries, the effect may be similar to two-party or multi-party systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>Doug, is there also an ethnic German party in Romania? 

Not really, no.  There simply aren't enough Germans left.  They are less than 0.5% of the population now.

I seem to remember reading a profile of a mayor of a medium-ish city in Transylvania 

Klaus Johannis, Mayor of Sibiu.  Which used to be a German city.  Even there, Germans are less than 5% of the population now.  But Johannis has been a great success as Mayor, and he won re-election in a landslide.


I'm wondering if this is a purely local phenomenon, or if there is actually a German party that's more widely active.

Local.  There is a German party, which calls itself something like the "Democratic Forum of Germans in Romania".  And it does claim to be nationwide.  But in national elections, it never gets more than 1% of the vote.  In fact, I think Johannis is its only big-town Mayor.

There is one German in the lower house of Parliament, because all recognized ethnic minorities are guaranteed one seat.  There are about fifteen of these.  Of all the ethnic minority groups, only one -- the Hungarians -- is big enough to have more seats than that one.  (Though the Roma probably could, if they ever got their act together.)  Hungarians and Roma excepted, all the minority groups together are less than 2% of the population.  However, the minority members make up about 5% of the ~300-strong Chamber of Deputies.

Interesting aside: it's the ~15 minority members -- the German, the Albanian, the Serb, the Greek, the Jew, the Turk and so forth -- who provide the swing votes for the current government, which has a very narrow parliamentary majority.  So, formal minority rights are fairly well protected in Romania. 

However, this recently led the government into deep waters, when the Hungarians plus the other minority members proposed a new, expanded bill of minority rights. Tudor's party went into spasms of nationalist outrage, and the rest of the opposition jumped on the bandwagon... even though, when they were in government (2000-2004), they'd been tolerably supportive of minority rights, and had included the Hungarians in the ruling coalition.

Also interesting that the Albanian minority in Macedonia can support at least two parliamentary parties, while the Hungarian minority in Romania can't. A function of proportions, sure, but still interesting. 

I'm not sure it's a function of proportions.  There may be cultural and historic roots for this.  One, the split seems to reflect the division between peacemakers and warmongers back in 2001-2.  Oversimplification, but I think that's part of it.  And two, it does seem like Albanian politics are naturally fissiparous, while the Hungarian minorities seem to be pretty well organized.

Final point: I think that having one party represent a large minority is probably a bad thing in the long run.  Though it may be a less-bad solution, if the alternative is that minority getting no representation at all.


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, is there also an ethnic German party in Romania? </p>
<p>Not really, no.  There simply aren&#8217;t enough Germans left.  They are less than 0.5% of the population now.</p>
<p>I seem to remember reading a profile of a mayor of a medium-ish city in Transylvania </p>
<p>Klaus Johannis, Mayor of Sibiu.  Which used to be a German city.  Even there, Germans are less than 5% of the population now.  But Johannis has been a great success as Mayor, and he won re-election in a landslide.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if this is a purely local phenomenon, or if there is actually a German party that&#8217;s more widely active.</p>
<p>Local.  There is a German party, which calls itself something like the &#8220;Democratic Forum of Germans in Romania&#8221;.  And it does claim to be nationwide.  But in national elections, it never gets more than 1% of the vote.  In fact, I think Johannis is its only big-town Mayor.</p>
<p>There is one German in the lower house of Parliament, because all recognized ethnic minorities are guaranteed one seat.  There are about fifteen of these.  Of all the ethnic minority groups, only one &#8212; the Hungarians &#8212; is big enough to have more seats than that one.  (Though the Roma probably could, if they ever got their act together.)  Hungarians and Roma excepted, all the minority groups together are less than 2% of the population.  However, the minority members make up about 5% of the ~300-strong Chamber of Deputies.</p>
<p>Interesting aside: it&#8217;s the ~15 minority members &#8212; the German, the Albanian, the Serb, the Greek, the Jew, the Turk and so forth &#8212; who provide the swing votes for the current government, which has a very narrow parliamentary majority.  So, formal minority rights are fairly well protected in Romania. </p>
<p>However, this recently led the government into deep waters, when the Hungarians plus the other minority members proposed a new, expanded bill of minority rights. Tudor&#8217;s party went into spasms of nationalist outrage, and the rest of the opposition jumped on the bandwagon&#8230; even though, when they were in government (2000-2004), they&#8217;d been tolerably supportive of minority rights, and had included the Hungarians in the ruling coalition.</p>
<p>Also interesting that the Albanian minority in Macedonia can support at least two parliamentary parties, while the Hungarian minority in Romania can&#8217;t. A function of proportions, sure, but still interesting. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s a function of proportions.  There may be cultural and historic roots for this.  One, the split seems to reflect the division between peacemakers and warmongers back in 2001-2.  Oversimplification, but I think that&#8217;s part of it.  And two, it does seem like Albanian politics are naturally fissiparous, while the Hungarian minorities seem to be pretty well organized.</p>
<p>Final point: I think that having one party represent a large minority is probably a bad thing in the long run.  Though it may be a less-bad solution, if the alternative is that minority getting no representation at all.</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug (not Muir)</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15283</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug (not Muir)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15283</guid>
		<description>Doug, is there also an ethnic German party in Romania? 

I seem to remember reading a profile of a mayor of a medium-ish city in Transylvania who was bringing the classic German virtues to bear on the job. He'd been re-elected twice, I think, and he ran on the ticket of this German party, which was drawing far more votes than there were actual ethnic Germans in the area. It was interesting that the German party had come to stand for something other than just ethnic attachment. So I'm wondering if this is a purely local phenomenon, or if there is actually a German party that's more widely active. And if there is, how they're doing given that there are so few Germans left in Romania.

(Also interesting that the Albanian minority in Macedonia can support at least two parliamentary parties, while the Hungarian minority in Romania can't. A function of proportions, sure, but still interesting. Are there multiple Hungarian parties at local or regional levels in areas with larger Hungarian shares of the population? After all, if the Antall government taught us anything back in the day [and I'm not all that sure that it did], it's that "We are all Hungarians" only gets you so far as a party platform.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, is there also an ethnic German party in Romania? </p>
<p>I seem to remember reading a profile of a mayor of a medium-ish city in Transylvania who was bringing the classic German virtues to bear on the job. He&#8217;d been re-elected twice, I think, and he ran on the ticket of this German party, which was drawing far more votes than there were actual ethnic Germans in the area. It was interesting that the German party had come to stand for something other than just ethnic attachment. So I&#8217;m wondering if this is a purely local phenomenon, or if there is actually a German party that&#8217;s more widely active. And if there is, how they&#8217;re doing given that there are so few Germans left in Romania.</p>
<p>(Also interesting that the Albanian minority in Macedonia can support at least two parliamentary parties, while the Hungarian minority in Romania can&#8217;t. A function of proportions, sure, but still interesting. Are there multiple Hungarian parties at local or regional levels in areas with larger Hungarian shares of the population? After all, if the Antall government taught us anything back in the day [and I'm not all that sure that it did], it&#8217;s that &#8220;We are all Hungarians&#8221; only gets you so far as a party platform.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, here's a question for our Slovak readers.

In Romania, the Hungarian party has been part of every government since 1996.

This is probably a good thing for Romania.  However, it's probably not so good for the Hungarians.  The party has grown really fat and stagnant.  So much so, that a lot of Hungarians are really sick of it.  

There was a movement before the last election to create a new, breakaway Hungarian party.  But the majority party succesfully suppressed it.  Partly this is because Romania has a 5% minimum threshold for representation in Parliament, and the Hungarians are only about 9% of the population.  So splitting the ticket could easily result in *no* Hungarians getting into Parliament.  At the end, the Hungarian minority sighed and went with the devil they knew.  But the result is that the party continues to become even more complacent and stagnant.

So, my question: how is the Hungarian party in Slovakia handling its time out of power?  I gather the Christian Democrats (the fourth small party) are in some disarray, but what are the Hungarians up to?


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, here&#8217;s a question for our Slovak readers.</p>
<p>In Romania, the Hungarian party has been part of every government since 1996.</p>
<p>This is probably a good thing for Romania.  However, it&#8217;s probably not so good for the Hungarians.  The party has grown really fat and stagnant.  So much so, that a lot of Hungarians are really sick of it.  </p>
<p>There was a movement before the last election to create a new, breakaway Hungarian party.  But the majority party succesfully suppressed it.  Partly this is because Romania has a 5% minimum threshold for representation in Parliament, and the Hungarians are only about 9% of the population.  So splitting the ticket could easily result in *no* Hungarians getting into Parliament.  At the end, the Hungarian minority sighed and went with the devil they knew.  But the result is that the party continues to become even more complacent and stagnant.</p>
<p>So, my question: how is the Hungarian party in Slovakia handling its time out of power?  I gather the Christian Democrats (the fourth small party) are in some disarray, but what are the Hungarians up to?</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15281</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15281</guid>
		<description>Knowing the local situation I can share the reasons why Slovaks support SNS and Slota. 

Eh.  SNS got about 11% of the vote.  That's less than (for instance) anti-Hungarian nationalist Vadim Tudor gets in Romania.

And, as noted, Slota's support seems to be strongest in areas where there are /few/ Hungarians.

Greater Hungary is dead.  Yeah, doofus Hungarian nationalists will be peddling maps and singing "Nem, Nem, Shoha" for the next five hundred years.  So?

I can buy a map of Greater Armenia that stretches from the Caspian to the Mediterranean, including much of modern Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Iraq, and about a third of modern Turkey and.  Does that mean Armenia is an imminent danger to Turkey?  

Come /on/.

I swear, sometimes it seems the best friends of idiot nationalists are other idiot nationalists.  "They'd slit all our throats if they could!  Look, here's a map!"

Then Lemuel:

the fact the Fico chose SNS and HZDS because it gives him more power isnt exactly a "positive interpretation", its downright scary.

All politicians want power, or they wouldn't be in politics.  A key question is whether they only want power, or whether they also want to do things with it.

I think it's positive because it's not Fico thinking, mmm, these guys, they're good guys... I like these guys... they're my friends.  No, he's treating them as total tools.  If they have to be in government, then that's the least bad way.

My suspicion -- and, okay, my hope -- is that Fico will allow the partners a certain amount of barking and yapping and acting out, but will keep them far from the levers of real power, and will not enact any of their policies unless it suits him.

This won't be pleasant, but it could be much worse.  Pause to imagine a Fico who liked and respected his partners, and who gave Slota and Meciar cabinet positions and listened carefully to them.


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing the local situation I can share the reasons why Slovaks support SNS and Slota. </p>
<p>Eh.  SNS got about 11% of the vote.  That&#8217;s less than (for instance) anti-Hungarian nationalist Vadim Tudor gets in Romania.</p>
<p>And, as noted, Slota&#8217;s support seems to be strongest in areas where there are /few/ Hungarians.</p>
<p>Greater Hungary is dead.  Yeah, doofus Hungarian nationalists will be peddling maps and singing &#8220;Nem, Nem, Shoha&#8221; for the next five hundred years.  So?</p>
<p>I can buy a map of Greater Armenia that stretches from the Caspian to the Mediterranean, including much of modern Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Iraq, and about a third of modern Turkey and.  Does that mean Armenia is an imminent danger to Turkey?  </p>
<p>Come /on/.</p>
<p>I swear, sometimes it seems the best friends of idiot nationalists are other idiot nationalists.  &#8220;They&#8217;d slit all our throats if they could!  Look, here&#8217;s a map!&#8221;</p>
<p>Then Lemuel:</p>
<p>the fact the Fico chose SNS and HZDS because it gives him more power isnt exactly a &#8220;positive interpretation&#8221;, its downright scary.</p>
<p>All politicians want power, or they wouldn&#8217;t be in politics.  A key question is whether they only want power, or whether they also want to do things with it.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s positive because it&#8217;s not Fico thinking, mmm, these guys, they&#8217;re good guys&#8230; I like these guys&#8230; they&#8217;re my friends.  No, he&#8217;s treating them as total tools.  If they have to be in government, then that&#8217;s the least bad way.</p>
<p>My suspicion &#8212; and, okay, my hope &#8212; is that Fico will allow the partners a certain amount of barking and yapping and acting out, but will keep them far from the levers of real power, and will not enact any of their policies unless it suits him.</p>
<p>This won&#8217;t be pleasant, but it could be much worse.  Pause to imagine a Fico who liked and respected his partners, and who gave Slota and Meciar cabinet positions and listened carefully to them.</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15280</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15280</guid>
		<description>Having the local civil service multilingual is a great boon for the Hungarians (and the local Slovaks). I assume that this is the case because that is only natural in an area were you have &gt;50% and so i don't see any need for any positive discrimination</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the local civil service multilingual is a great boon for the Hungarians (and the local Slovaks). I assume that this is the case because that is only natural in an area were you have >50% and so i don&#8217;t see any need for any positive discrimination</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/governments-and-parties/slovakia-hm/#comment-15279</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2627#comment-15279</guid>
		<description>Re: Goerge I dont know...

Lemuel, my opinion is based on staying in southern Slovakia. Yes, the most popular seems to be SNS in the north, but that is the region with Slovak roots. Despite the fact of south regions consisting of &gt;50% Hungarians. 
I believe there has to be NO positive discrimination, cause this kind of decree will always produce negative side effects.

I've had the same opinion as you, before I faced the propaganda - printed maps ""big hungary" and other stupidities with southern part of Slovakia called "Felvidek".  Btw. take a look at http://www.felvidek.ma/ and you will realize... A shame you don't understand hungarian.

Yeah, Slovakia is a complicated country...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Goerge I dont know&#8230;</p>
<p>Lemuel, my opinion is based on staying in southern Slovakia. Yes, the most popular seems to be SNS in the north, but that is the region with Slovak roots. Despite the fact of south regions consisting of >50% Hungarians.<br />
I believe there has to be NO positive discrimination, cause this kind of decree will always produce negative side effects.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the same opinion as you, before I faced the propaganda - printed maps &#8220;&#8221;big hungary&#8221; and other stupidities with southern part of Slovakia called &#8220;Felvidek&#8221;.  Btw. take a look at <a href="http://www.felvidek.ma/" rel="nofollow">http://www.felvidek.ma/</a> and you will realize&#8230; A shame you don&#8217;t understand hungarian.</p>
<p>Yeah, Slovakia is a complicated country&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
