Just a quick post to point our readers to a very interesting article in The New York Times by Parag Khanna entitled Waving goodbye to hegemony. Hat tip goes to EUlogist and a comment he made over at Nosemonkey’s EUtopia. The article talks about the redistribution of world power after the end of the Cold War and foresees a prominent role for Europe. Plenty of food for thought. Two quotes to wet your appetites (emphasis mine):
In Europeâ€™s capital, Brussels, technocrats, strategists and legislators increasingly see their role as being the global balancer between America and China. Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, a German member of the European Parliament, calls it â€œEuropean patriotism.â€ The Europeans play both sides, and if they do it well, they profit handsomely. Itâ€™s a trend that will outlast both President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, the self-described â€œfriend of America,â€ and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, regardless of her visiting the Crawford ranch.
While America fumbles at nation-building, Europe spends its money and political capital on locking peripheral countries into its orbit. Many poor regions of the world have realized that they want the European dream, not the American dream. Africa wants a real African Union like the E.U.; we offer no equivalent. Activists in the Middle East want parliamentary democracy like Europeâ€™s, not American-style presidential strongman rule. Many of the foreign students we shunned after 9/11 are now in London and Berlin: twice as many Chinese study in Europe as in the U.S. We didnâ€™t educate them, so we have no claims on their brains or loyalties as we have in decades past. More broadly, America controls legacy institutions few seem to want â€” like the International Monetary Fund â€” while Europe excels at building new and sophisticated ones modeled on itself.
What I found particularly refreshing in this article is Khanna’s focus on the role of “second-world countries”:
They are not in the first-world core of the global economy, nor in its third-world periphery. Lying alongside and between the Big Three, second-world countries are the swing states that will determine which of the superpowers has the upper hand for the next generation of geopolitics. From Venezuela to Vietnam and Morocco to Malaysia, the new reality of global affairs is that there is not one way to win allies and influence countries but three: Americaâ€™s coalition (as in â€œcoalition of the willingâ€), Europeâ€™s consensus and Chinaâ€™s consultative styles. The geopolitical marketplace will decide which will lead the 21st century.
I invite you to go and read the article and share your thoughts with us.