“The US has reportedly complained after the Israeli army destroyed wells built for civilians in Gaza by an American government aid agency. Huge areas have been demolished by the Israelis in the Gaza Strip in recent weeks, including more than 150 homes. The wells had just been dug by the United States Agency for International Development (USAid). A few months ago the agency announced a $20m (?12m) project to rebuild infrastructure including roads, electricity supply lines and sewers in the occupied territories. . .”

- from: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=460551

http://headheeb.blogmosis.com/archives/017641.html

He points out, among other things, that the Palestinians weren’t on the list, nor were any associated terrorist groups. In that situation, one might quite reasonably vote for Israel as a proxy for the entire conflict. I might have done so myself. And then everyone would crow about me being anti-semitic. It was a dumb survey basically…

*I beleive ‘charecteristically insightful’ is officially a blogger cliche by now. Never mind.

Another excellent book is Amira Hass “Drinking the Sea at Gaza”, also available in German: “Gaza”.

Amira Hass is an Israeli journalist who writes for Haaretz http://www.haaretz.com/, a liberal paper. Since ca.1990 she has lived among the Palestinians, first in Gaza, now in Ramallah. She draws a vivid picture of everyday Palestinian life first under Israeli occupation and then under Arafat, and describes the effect Israeli policies have on the common Palestinian people.

First off, I read somewhere else that the Palestinians were not included in the list of choices.

Second, the people interviewed could name several countries as being a threat to peace. Logically, being the most named does not have to imply that the country in question is the “biggest threat”. For example, 50% may think that, say, San Marino is the biggest threat and another 50% may regard Andorra as the biggest threat, but 60% may name Israel as a lower-level threat. The jornalist reporting poll then calls Israel the largest threat.

Greetings
Karl Heinz

Hamburg, Germany

They were trying to measure a … err… something. But what is it? How do those polled define that question? Does it mean “country X will start a war soon” or “country X will be involved in a war with certainty sometime in the future” or “country X has a misguided foreign policy” or “country X is bad” or “the news I hear about country X scare me most” or “I can’t stand country X” or “I’m too afraid to spend my vacations in country X”? This question can have so many different meanings that it is a meaningless question.

Never expect reasonable results out of polls consisting of unreasonable questions.

I’ve been messaging in a range of international online boards for many years now. Sad to say, it has been a recurring personal experience that posting any criticism of military actions by the state of Israel is apt to get me denounced as “anti-semitic” even though my personal views of the context converge with those of Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s chief Rabbi, or Gerald kaufman MP.

Try: http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,781113,00.html or http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1874459.stm and http://www.deiryassin.org/gkaufman.html

Any readers here interested in knowing of a widely acclaimed book, which for me shed altogether new light on the tragic history of the conflict in Palestine, may like to know of: Avi Shlaim: The Iron Wall; Penguin Books (2001). The author, an Israeli, is professor of international relations at Oxford University.

For another perspective, this is from the text of a speech by Lawrence Summers, now President of Harvard and previously Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration:

” . . where anti-Semitism and views that are profoundly anti-Israeli have traditionally been the primary preserve of poorly educated right-wing populists, profoundly anti-Israel views are increasingly finding support in progressive intellectual communities. Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent.” - from: http://www.israelaustin.com/israelnow/news/26sep2002d.asp