<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A pyrrhic victory for privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/europe-and-the-world/a-pyrrhic-victory-for-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/europe-and-the-world/a-pyrrhic-victory-for-privacy/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/europe-and-the-world/a-pyrrhic-victory-for-privacy/#comment-14721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2556#comment-14721</guid>
		<description>ZF - I suppose that "anti-US" posing may have some relevance, but given the fact that the EP is the only institution that has opposed not simply the US PNR but also the European home-made privacy infringements (like communication data retention), I think you're being unfair.

Joe - I don't think liked the status quo and I doubt they thought that the court would use the legal point it did to strike down the measure. Their concerns are as valid as before. I think it's just important to understand the identity of EU and US interests in this and all other data mining issues. (Mostly national) European politicians are hiding behind alleged US pressure and are using EU institutions to do what they want just as much.

The lack of American privacy regulations will become the predominant issue in the next round. The US has already announced it wants to tap into the European telcos retained pool of telecommunications data. Quite frankly, in my opinion, this will only end after a national constitutional court rules it incompatible with a a national constitution. My guess is it's gonna happen in Karlsruhe, Germany, a couple of months after the directive has become German law.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZF - I suppose that &#8220;anti-US&#8221; posing may have some relevance, but given the fact that the EP is the only institution that has opposed not simply the US PNR but also the European home-made privacy infringements (like communication data retention), I think you&#8217;re being unfair.</p>
<p>Joe - I don&#8217;t think liked the status quo and I doubt they thought that the court would use the legal point it did to strike down the measure. Their concerns are as valid as before. I think it&#8217;s just important to understand the identity of EU and US interests in this and all other data mining issues. (Mostly national) European politicians are hiding behind alleged US pressure and are using EU institutions to do what they want just as much.</p>
<p>The lack of American privacy regulations will become the predominant issue in the next round. The US has already announced it wants to tap into the European telcos retained pool of telecommunications data. Quite frankly, in my opinion, this will only end after a national constitutional court rules it incompatible with a a national constitution. My guess is it&#8217;s gonna happen in Karlsruhe, Germany, a couple of months after the directive has become German law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe carrasco</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/europe-and-the-world/a-pyrrhic-victory-for-privacy/#comment-14720</link>
		<dc:creator>joe carrasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 21:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2556#comment-14720</guid>
		<description>Interesting to have statewatch considering it a pyrrhic victory after all the fuss they made when the EU initially started working with the US on these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to have statewatch considering it a pyrrhic victory after all the fuss they made when the EU initially started working with the US on these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZF</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/europe-and-the-world/a-pyrrhic-victory-for-privacy/#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>ZF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2556#comment-14719</guid>
		<description>"...the standard of privacy protection could actually be worse than in the original PNR deal”

Not a concern to the EU parliamentarians, for whom this was always about their vanity 'anti-US' pose. How much more angry they would be if they understood how little Americans care about their hissy fits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the standard of privacy protection could actually be worse than in the original PNR deal”</p>
<p>Not a concern to the EU parliamentarians, for whom this was always about their vanity &#8216;anti-US&#8217; pose. How much more angry they would be if they understood how little Americans care about their hissy fits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
