Europe and secularism

Via DJ Nozem I was directed to a very interesting and very important article on Eurozine about European secularism and its role in shaping European identities. The text contains many useful insights and provides a wealth of discussion material. I’ll give one quote for our readers to consider and debate, emphasis mine, but please do and go read everything.

Internal differences notwithstanding, western European societies are deeply secular societies, shaped by the hegemonic knowledge regime of secularism. As liberal democratic societies they tolerate and respect individual religious freedom. But due to the pressure towards the privatization of religion, which among European societies has become a taken-for-granted characteristic of the self-definition of a modern secular society, those societies have a much greater difficulty in recognizing some legitimate role for religion in public life and in the organization and mobilization of collective group identities. Muslim organized collective identities and their public representations become a source of anxiety not only because of their religious otherness as a non-Christian and non-European religion, but more importantly because of their religiousness itself as the other of European secularity. In this context, the temptation to identify Islam and fundamentalism becomes the more pronounced. Islam, by definition, becomes the other of Western secular modernity. Therefore, the problems posed by the incorporation of Muslim immigrants become consciously or unconsciously associated with seemingly related and vexatious issues concerning the role of religion in the public sphere, which European societies assumed they had already solved according to the liberal secular norm of privatization of religion.

The sentence in bold goes to the heart of what I personally feel to be one of the main issues we are dealing with. Sure, Muslim fundamentalists who are ready to throw bombs and cause physical damage are a real threat and get plenty of media attention, deservedly or not. However, I believe the issues are much larger and much more complex. Terrorists, for better or for worse, are still a minority within a minority. There are bigger forces and trends at play here, as Eurozine points out:

The final and more responsible option would be to face the difficult and polemical task of defining through open and public debate the political identity of the new European Union: Who are we? Where do we come from? What constitutes our spiritual and moral heritage and the boundaries of our collective identities? How flexible internally and how open externally should those boundaries be? This would be under any circumstance an enormously complex task that would entail addressing and coming to terms with the many problematic and contradictory aspects of the European heritage in its intra-national, inter-European, and global-colonial dimensions. But such a complex task is made the more difficult by secularist prejudices that preclude not only a critical yet honest and reflexive assessment of the Judeo-Christian heritage, but even any public official reference to such a heritage, on the grounds that any reference to religion could be divisive and counterproductive, or simply violates secular postulates.

106 thoughts on “Europe and secularism

  1. These numbers do not change much.

    1.9 children is not “quite a few children.”

    Many Turks marry Western women and their children are Muslim.

    From what little I know, Turks in Germanic Europe are considerably more endogamous than Maghrebins in Latin Europe. Cites, please?

    Being from a mixed marriage doesn’t make them assimilated (see the shoebomber case).

    That speaks about Reid. How typical is he?

  2. Quite typical, if the most recent terrorism case is anything to go by. Converts appear to be the most likely source of terrorist recruits, which renders profiling and such not just useless but actively harmful.

  3. Again the shoebomber has a non Muslim West Indian father. I really don’t see what this has to do with Muslim immigrants.

  4. “Quite typical, if the most recent terrorism case is anything to go by. Converts appear to be the most likely source of terrorist recruits, which renders profiling and such not just useless but actively harmful.”

    Agreed that converts, because of the factor of choice, are more likely to be radical than people born into the faith. What proportion of converts? Back to the original commenter, what proportion of people of mixed background are going to be radicals? Do they have _any_ statistics?

  5. Адвокат оказывает юридические услуги, юридическая консультация, юридическая
    помощь, юридическая консультация по вопросам таможенного оформления, экспорт,
    импорт, таможенный адвокат, адвокат по контрабанде,
    адвокат по таможенным вопросам, юридическая консультация,
    таможенный адвокат, таможенная консультация, уголовный адвокат, адвокат по должностным преступлениям

  6. õî÷åøü ñåêñà êàæäûé äåíü ?

    Íå ñòåñíÿéñÿ áóäü ñìåëåé, çàéäè íà ALLSEXCONTACT.rã ñêîðåé

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>