Well, today is the 30 of June, and still no news from the IMF on releasing the next tranche of the Latvian loan. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why (via Ott Umelas at Bloomberg).
Estoniaâ€™s fiscal deficit under European Union terms more than doubled in the first quarter from a year earlier, indicating the Baltic country may not be able to adopt the euro in January 2011. The deficit, including social security and state and municipal spending, rose to 5.57 billion krooni ($502 million) from 2.06 billion krooni a year earlier, according to data published on the statistics officeâ€™s Web site today. The gap corresponds to 2.5 percent of gross domestic product, according to Bloomberg calculations based on the Finance Ministryâ€™s forecast for Estonian GDP for 2009.
The first-quarter figure means the government will have to keep the deficit at 0.5 percent of GDP for the rest of the year to meet euro-entry criteria. Finance Minister Jurgen Ligi has said he sees no improvement in the economy before the third quarter. The minority Cabinet of Prime Minister Andrus Ansip has cut the 2009 budget deficit by 16 billion krooni, or 7.3 percent of GDP, in recent months to avoid depleting state reserves and keep the fiscal deficit at last yearâ€™s level of 3 percent of GDP, the same as the EUâ€™s budget-deficit threshold. This would allow Estonia to adopt the euro in January 2011, the governmentâ€™s main economic goal.
So why a “Latvian-style” noose? Because these countries have built for themselves a sort of “paradox of fiscal thrift” connundrum, whereby the more you cut, the more GDP falls, the more revenue rises, the more spending grows, the more the fiscal deficit goes up, the more you have to cut, and so on. In the end, as Kenneth Rogoff said yesterday, it simply becomes too painful. There seems no way Estonia can achieve a 3 percent deficit this year at this point. And remember what IMF First Deputy Managing Director John Lipsky said last week.
â€œIf there is a solution it begins with macro policies,â€ Lipsky said. â€œNo single exchange rates solution, or exchange regime represents a solution to these kinds of problems. What is important is that the currency regime is credible and coherentâ€.
Estonia now has no exit strategy, at least not to join the euro in 2011 it doesn’t And then we have Lithuania and Bulgaria to think about. Basically, the ECB and the European Commission should never have drawn a line in the sand across the original Maastricht criteria. But it’s too late for that now.
For Background Reading and Arguments on All This, See:
Why The IMF’s Decision To Agree A Lavian Bailout Programme Without Devaluation Is A Mistake
Why Latvia Needs To Devalue Soon – A Reply To Christoph Rosenberg
Latvia – Devalue Now or Devalue Later
The Long And Difficult Road To Wage Cuts As An Alternative To Devaluation
Why You Need Devaluation – An Open Letter To The People Of Estonia<
Devaluation, Euro Membership And Loan Defaults – Some Thoughts For My Critics
And For Why It Is The Baltics Have The Problem In The First Place, See
Is The Latvian Economy Running Out Of People?
The Clock Is Ticking Away Under Latvia
Taking Solow Seriously – Does Neoclassical Steady State Growth Really Exist?
Latvian Population Dynamics
Hard or Soft Landing in Latvia?