<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you shouldn&#8217;t care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-21795</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-21795</guid>
		<description>So what is the U.S.'s economic and political interests in the conflict? I imagine that the regional oil plays a huge factor, as well as the push for democracy in the former second-world. I believe the State Dept.'s official stand is that Azer. is entitled to its soveriegn territory, and of course the Turkish-Aremnian conflict would push more U.S. support towards its key regional ally (Turkey) and its OEF/OIF contributer (Azer.). Iran's good relations with Armenia definitely complicates things as well. 

I would imagine that this could spur additional secessionist movements if the Armenians are successful, thereby perhaps igniting this caucausian powder keg. 

So what else could be the U.S.'s key economic and political interests? How so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is the U.S.&#8217;s economic and political interests in the conflict? I imagine that the regional oil plays a huge factor, as well as the push for democracy in the former second-world. I believe the State Dept.&#8217;s official stand is that Azer. is entitled to its soveriegn territory, and of course the Turkish-Aremnian conflict would push more U.S. support towards its key regional ally (Turkey) and its OEF/OIF contributer (Azer.). Iran&#8217;s good relations with Armenia definitely complicates things as well. </p>
<p>I would imagine that this could spur additional secessionist movements if the Armenians are successful, thereby perhaps igniting this caucausian powder keg. </p>
<p>So what else could be the U.S.&#8217;s key economic and political interests? How so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Karabakh, Much More &#124; afoe &#124; A Fistful of Euros &#124; European Opinion</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-19819</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Karabakh, Much More &#124; afoe &#124; A Fistful of Euros &#124; European Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-19819</guid>
		<description>[...] too long ago, Doug Muir wrote about why Nagorno-Karabakh may be coming soon to a front page near you. Back in the mid-1990s, I wrote something much longer on the conflict [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too long ago, Doug Muir wrote about why Nagorno-Karabakh may be coming soon to a front page near you. Back in the mid-1990s, I wrote something much longer on the conflict [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-19071</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-19071</guid>
		<description>Armenia knows that the Karabakh problem must be resolved in an amicable way, and it has been preparing for the moment for the past several years. The problem is that whoever signs the agreement on the Armenian side will be ostracized by the people of both Armenia and Karabakh. So the decision has been held back until Armenia's two Karabakhi dictators finally assert their dominance, by installing Sargsyan as President, after which Kocharian will undoubtedly be made Prime Minister. When that happens (maybe the first part already has?), be sure that the Karabakh problem will very quickly be resolved; not for any legal, moral or political reason, simply so that Kocharian, Sargsyan and their small (but soon to be quickly increasing) circle of cronies can cash in on the billions of dollars of ill-gotten gains they have been laundering in Yerevan through the past several years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armenia knows that the Karabakh problem must be resolved in an amicable way, and it has been preparing for the moment for the past several years. The problem is that whoever signs the agreement on the Armenian side will be ostracized by the people of both Armenia and Karabakh. So the decision has been held back until Armenia&#8217;s two Karabakhi dictators finally assert their dominance, by installing Sargsyan as President, after which Kocharian will undoubtedly be made Prime Minister. When that happens (maybe the first part already has?), be sure that the Karabakh problem will very quickly be resolved; not for any legal, moral or political reason, simply so that Kocharian, Sargsyan and their small (but soon to be quickly increasing) circle of cronies can cash in on the billions of dollars of ill-gotten gains they have been laundering in Yerevan through the past several years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18847</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18847</guid>
		<description>The BTC pipeline runs through the part of Georgia populated by ethnic Armenians. This is where the pipeline is most likely to be sabotaged in the event of a war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BTC pipeline runs through the part of Georgia populated by ethnic Armenians. This is where the pipeline is most likely to be sabotaged in the event of a war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azerbaijan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Azerbaijan cuisine and food</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18803</link>
		<dc:creator>Azerbaijan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Azerbaijan cuisine and food</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18803</guid>
		<description>[...] Why you shouldn&#8217;t care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why you shouldn&#8217;t care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azerbaijan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why you shouldn't care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18754</link>
		<dc:creator>Azerbaijan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why you shouldn't care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18754</guid>
		<description>[...] Why you shouldn&#8217;t care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why you shouldn&#8217;t care about Nagorno-Karabakh (and why you might one day have to) (Doug Muir)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18723</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18723</guid>
		<description>@Piotr:  I'll let someone who knows more about these matters (Alex?) discuss the "Janes" aspect of Azeri rearmament.  

I will say that, at current oil prices, the pipeline is bringing them well over a billion dollars a month... maybe closer to two billion.  Two billion dollars buys a lot of end user certificates.

Also, as to Armenia having a secure land route through Iran?  Dude.  I've been over that land route.  It's a twisty, mountainous highway that goes over a couple of high (&#62;2,000 meter) passes and that regularly shuts down for weeks at a time in winter.  There's another road from Karabakh to Iran -- I've been on that one too; it's in better shape, but it's awfully close to the frontier.

Armenia to Georgia?  Two two-lane roads, one not-so-great rail line.  Again, the roads regularly close in winter.  (There's no rail line to Iran.  Used to be back in Soviet times, but it went through Nakhichevan.)

Icing on the cake: there are just two roads between Armenia and Karabakh, and one is a high trail that hasn't been fixed since Soviet times.  The other is in good shape but, again, is narrow and twisty and tends to close in winter.

Armenia is much more isolated than Azerbaijan.  Much more.  It has only a handful -- literally a handful, you can count them on your fingers -- of road and rail links to its neighbors.  And if the Azeris ever got command of the air, they could sever those links with ease.  Whether that's plausible is something else again, but it should be making both sides thoughtful.


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Piotr:  I&#8217;ll let someone who knows more about these matters (Alex?) discuss the &#8220;Janes&#8221; aspect of Azeri rearmament.  </p>
<p>I will say that, at current oil prices, the pipeline is bringing them well over a billion dollars a month&#8230; maybe closer to two billion.  Two billion dollars buys a lot of end user certificates.</p>
<p>Also, as to Armenia having a secure land route through Iran?  Dude.  I&#8217;ve been over that land route.  It&#8217;s a twisty, mountainous highway that goes over a couple of high (&gt;2,000 meter) passes and that regularly shuts down for weeks at a time in winter.  There&#8217;s another road from Karabakh to Iran &#8212; I&#8217;ve been on that one too; it&#8217;s in better shape, but it&#8217;s awfully close to the frontier.</p>
<p>Armenia to Georgia?  Two two-lane roads, one not-so-great rail line.  Again, the roads regularly close in winter.  (There&#8217;s no rail line to Iran.  Used to be back in Soviet times, but it went through Nakhichevan.)</p>
<p>Icing on the cake: there are just two roads between Armenia and Karabakh, and one is a high trail that hasn&#8217;t been fixed since Soviet times.  The other is in good shape but, again, is narrow and twisty and tends to close in winter.</p>
<p>Armenia is much more isolated than Azerbaijan.  Much more.  It has only a handful &#8212; literally a handful, you can count them on your fingers &#8212; of road and rail links to its neighbors.  And if the Azeris ever got command of the air, they could sever those links with ease.  Whether that&#8217;s plausible is something else again, but it should be making both sides thoughtful.</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piotr</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18718</link>
		<dc:creator>piotr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18718</guid>
		<description>I suspect that would Azeris attack Armenia, they would be much worse for the wear.

One question who would supplied them with quality military hardware.  Russia and Iran support Armenia, Turkey supports Azerbaijan, but Western countries, USA included, much less so.  So I do not expect Azeris to get really hot weapons that could make big difference.

Armenians hold high ground and probably intelligently fortified the frontier.  So it would not be a blitz-krieg.  And who would supply the belligents with fresh ammo?  Azerbaijan would probably be quickly cut-off from possible supplies through Georgia, while Armenia would have secure land supply routes from Iran and air-lift from Russia.

On top of that, Nakhichevan enclave can be accessed by Azerbaijan only because of gracious permission of Iran.

So the most prudent policy for Azerbaijan is to keep its "petro-military complex" a peaceful oasis of multi-billion dollar graft.  Armenians, on the other hand, have their backs against the wall and military matters are dead serious for them.  Plus, they can get decent weapons and as much ammo as they may need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that would Azeris attack Armenia, they would be much worse for the wear.</p>
<p>One question who would supplied them with quality military hardware.  Russia and Iran support Armenia, Turkey supports Azerbaijan, but Western countries, USA included, much less so.  So I do not expect Azeris to get really hot weapons that could make big difference.</p>
<p>Armenians hold high ground and probably intelligently fortified the frontier.  So it would not be a blitz-krieg.  And who would supply the belligents with fresh ammo?  Azerbaijan would probably be quickly cut-off from possible supplies through Georgia, while Armenia would have secure land supply routes from Iran and air-lift from Russia.</p>
<p>On top of that, Nakhichevan enclave can be accessed by Azerbaijan only because of gracious permission of Iran.</p>
<p>So the most prudent policy for Azerbaijan is to keep its &#8220;petro-military complex&#8221; a peaceful oasis of multi-billion dollar graft.  Armenians, on the other hand, have their backs against the wall and military matters are dead serious for them.  Plus, they can get decent weapons and as much ammo as they may need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18711</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18711</guid>
		<description>@Oliver: Armenia doesn't care.  Or rather, it cares, but it'll piss off the world if that's what it takes to keep Karabakh.

@Doug: Aliyev _fils_ is in a much weaker position than Aliyev _pere_.  Even with the oil money, he just doesn't command the same sort of fear and respect.  So there's a strong incentive for him to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels.

Also, he's been building up the military, which Father Aliyev was always wary of.  Heydar Aliyev was no fool -- he rose from obscure origins, up through the ranks of State Security, to die old and in bed.  He understood the risks of giving money to the colonels and generals.  Aliyev Junior... is creating a petro-military complex that's quickly taking on a life of its own.  He may one day have no choice but to turn the beast out, lest it turn its appetite on him.

Meanwhile, Azeri propaganda about Karabakh has gotten more intense and less connected to reality with each passing year.  By now there's a real danger of blowback, with the ruling elites starting to believe their own bullshit.  Again, this was not an issue under Aliyev Senior, but Junior and the people around him aren't that kind of smart.  

Finally, there are the refugees: several hundred thousand of them, well on their way to forming a permanent underclass.  It's still ironclad government policy not to integrate them into society (because that would be admitting that they're not going home).  So they sit in the camps and fester.  That's a continuing irritation that's grown worse, not better, over time.


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oliver: Armenia doesn&#8217;t care.  Or rather, it cares, but it&#8217;ll piss off the world if that&#8217;s what it takes to keep Karabakh.</p>
<p>@Doug: Aliyev _fils_ is in a much weaker position than Aliyev _pere_.  Even with the oil money, he just doesn&#8217;t command the same sort of fear and respect.  So there&#8217;s a strong incentive for him to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels.</p>
<p>Also, he&#8217;s been building up the military, which Father Aliyev was always wary of.  Heydar Aliyev was no fool &#8212; he rose from obscure origins, up through the ranks of State Security, to die old and in bed.  He understood the risks of giving money to the colonels and generals.  Aliyev Junior&#8230; is creating a petro-military complex that&#8217;s quickly taking on a life of its own.  He may one day have no choice but to turn the beast out, lest it turn its appetite on him.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Azeri propaganda about Karabakh has gotten more intense and less connected to reality with each passing year.  By now there&#8217;s a real danger of blowback, with the ruling elites starting to believe their own bullshit.  Again, this was not an issue under Aliyev Senior, but Junior and the people around him aren&#8217;t that kind of smart.  </p>
<p>Finally, there are the refugees: several hundred thousand of them, well on their way to forming a permanent underclass.  It&#8217;s still ironclad government policy not to integrate them into society (because that would be admitting that they&#8217;re not going home).  So they sit in the camps and fester.  That&#8217;s a continuing irritation that&#8217;s grown worse, not better, over time.</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug M.</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to/#comment-18710</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/energy/why-you-shouldnt-care-about-nagorno-karabakh-and-why-you-might-one-day-have-to#comment-18710</guid>
		<description>@Peter: the pipeline went to Ceyhan because Turkey is sick of monster oil tankers going through the Bosporus.  

Under a 1935 agreement with the USSR, Turkey is obliged to allow free traffic through the straits.  But since then, traffic has increased something like a hundred times over... while, at the same time, Istanbul has turned into an immense modern city sprawling along both sides of the (narrow) strait.  Ship traffic is now pretty much constant rush hour, and the Turks are seriously worried about a major accident -- an oil tanker running aground, for instance.

If the pipeline had stopped at the Black Sea, it would have added to the traffic in the Straits, and in the worst possible way: one supertanker after another.  The Turks really, really wanted to avoid that.


Doug M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: the pipeline went to Ceyhan because Turkey is sick of monster oil tankers going through the Bosporus.  </p>
<p>Under a 1935 agreement with the USSR, Turkey is obliged to allow free traffic through the straits.  But since then, traffic has increased something like a hundred times over&#8230; while, at the same time, Istanbul has turned into an immense modern city sprawling along both sides of the (narrow) strait.  Ship traffic is now pretty much constant rush hour, and the Turks are seriously worried about a major accident &#8212; an oil tanker running aground, for instance.</p>
<p>If the pipeline had stopped at the Black Sea, it would have added to the traffic in the Straits, and in the worst possible way: one supertanker after another.  The Turks really, really wanted to avoid that.</p>
<p>Doug M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
