<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Italy and the Eurozone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paris ib</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15931</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15931</guid>
		<description>These ideas about Italy are based on ignorance and prejudice.  There are no facts quoted and that is also the basis for the discussion of Italy's 'potential' to exit from the Euro.  I've heard this type of thing before. A big U.S. players spread the word in the 1990s that: a) Italy would default on outstanding Government debt in order to encourage Lira selling (this particular player was obviously short Lira).  The rumour spreading ignored the fact that pretty much ALL of Italy's Government debt was held by Italian households and not even traded on the secondary market.  Default was unlikely, it in fact did not take place.  

This type of "analysis" and rumour mongering usually hides a bottom line somewhere for somebody and it plays on the ignorance of economic facts and prejudice about Italy and Italians.  Italy's transformation to an industrial power post WWII was on par with the transformation of Japan.  Fact.  Now that the Americans no longer have an interest in Italian political affairs, after the fall of the Berlin War (ie. to keep the Comunists out and to prevent 'strong' government via an imposed post-War constitution), there has also been progress on political stability, electoral reform etc.  

The facts do not support a negative outlook on Italy, quite the reverse.  I won't go into them here but evenutally I will post on my blog, just because I can't stand this total ignorance passing for analysis.  Has anyone here even quoted a single statistic or real hard fact regarding the Italian economy ?  I can't find any.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ideas about Italy are based on ignorance and prejudice.  There are no facts quoted and that is also the basis for the discussion of Italy&#8217;s &#8216;potential&#8217; to exit from the Euro.  I&#8217;ve heard this type of thing before. A big U.S. players spread the word in the 1990s that: a) Italy would default on outstanding Government debt in order to encourage Lira selling (this particular player was obviously short Lira).  The rumour spreading ignored the fact that pretty much ALL of Italy&#8217;s Government debt was held by Italian households and not even traded on the secondary market.  Default was unlikely, it in fact did not take place.  </p>
<p>This type of &#8220;analysis&#8221; and rumour mongering usually hides a bottom line somewhere for somebody and it plays on the ignorance of economic facts and prejudice about Italy and Italians.  Italy&#8217;s transformation to an industrial power post WWII was on par with the transformation of Japan.  Fact.  Now that the Americans no longer have an interest in Italian political affairs, after the fall of the Berlin War (ie. to keep the Comunists out and to prevent &#8217;strong&#8217; government via an imposed post-War constitution), there has also been progress on political stability, electoral reform etc.  </p>
<p>The facts do not support a negative outlook on Italy, quite the reverse.  I won&#8217;t go into them here but evenutally I will post on my blog, just because I can&#8217;t stand this total ignorance passing for analysis.  Has anyone here even quoted a single statistic or real hard fact regarding the Italian economy ?  I can&#8217;t find any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy McDonald</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15930</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15930</guid>
		<description>Italy's certainly a major player in the European Union. Leaving aside the question of where northern Italy fits--central Europe, perhaps?--the Mediterranean has been a major participant in Europe's various exchanges. If nothing else, at the beginning of the European project the Mediterranean was Europe's first true periphery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Italy&#8217;s certainly a major player in the European Union. Leaving aside the question of where northern Italy fits&#8211;central Europe, perhaps?&#8211;the Mediterranean has been a major participant in Europe&#8217;s various exchanges. If nothing else, at the beginning of the European project the Mediterranean was Europe&#8217;s first true periphery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15929</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15929</guid>
		<description>France had the institutional ideal of having natural borders like the Pyrenees, Alps and Rhine. Conquering the area between Ile de France and the Alps was easy. Mostly because that part of France isn't that fertile. The area between the Ile de France and the Rhine is fertile which makes keeping it much harder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France had the institutional ideal of having natural borders like the Pyrenees, Alps and Rhine. Conquering the area between Ile de France and the Alps was easy. Mostly because that part of France isn&#8217;t that fertile. The area between the Ile de France and the Rhine is fertile which makes keeping it much harder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris ib</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15928</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15928</guid>
		<description>And one thing you seem to have missed: France went to war with GERMANY over and over and over over the past few centuries.  There is no history of anything like that kind of hostility between France and Italy.  NONE.  Don't know where you get your views boy, but they need serious revising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one thing you seem to have missed: France went to war with GERMANY over and over and over over the past few centuries.  There is no history of anything like that kind of hostility between France and Italy.  NONE.  Don&#8217;t know where you get your views boy, but they need serious revising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris ib</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15927</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15927</guid>
		<description>We are talking the EURO here.  The EURO is part of the EEC.  The EURO has been a natural progression from the EEC monetary system.  And it works.  Italy is a founding member of the EEC and a founding member of the EURO.  For a lot of people in Europe Italy is more important and more central to European culture than say the descendents of the vandals and visigoths and those who used to be (and in some quarters still are) called barbarians.  Perhaps you are not aware of that.  

Watch say "My Big Fact Greek Wedding" to get a slightly different perspective.  The culture of Northern Europe is not universally revered.  Although you may not be aware of that fact, it is still true.  The Anglo-Saxon world, and indeed Germans, seem to be obsessed with the success of the Roman Empire (and both have tried to emulate that success with laughable results), at the same time though there seems to be this need to denigrate Italy which was the centre of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance.  What is it with you guys: jealousy ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are talking the EURO here.  The EURO is part of the EEC.  The EURO has been a natural progression from the EEC monetary system.  And it works.  Italy is a founding member of the EEC and a founding member of the EURO.  For a lot of people in Europe Italy is more important and more central to European culture than say the descendents of the vandals and visigoths and those who used to be (and in some quarters still are) called barbarians.  Perhaps you are not aware of that.  </p>
<p>Watch say &#8220;My Big Fact Greek Wedding&#8221; to get a slightly different perspective.  The culture of Northern Europe is not universally revered.  Although you may not be aware of that fact, it is still true.  The Anglo-Saxon world, and indeed Germans, seem to be obsessed with the success of the Roman Empire (and both have tried to emulate that success with laughable results), at the same time though there seems to be this need to denigrate Italy which was the centre of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance.  What is it with you guys: jealousy ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15926</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15926</guid>
		<description>I wrote Europe, not EU and i did not do that by accident. Scandinavia has a population smaller than the Benelux so the fact that they aren't the core of Europe is obvious. But Germany, which is the core, is cultural very close to Scandinavia.Add France and their historic view of the Italians and i seriously doubt that you can call Italy a essential part of the Union. But has Italian i bet you would think differently about that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote Europe, not EU and i did not do that by accident. Scandinavia has a population smaller than the Benelux so the fact that they aren&#8217;t the core of Europe is obvious. But Germany, which is the core, is cultural very close to Scandinavia.Add France and their historic view of the Italians and i seriously doubt that you can call Italy a essential part of the Union. But has Italian i bet you would think differently about that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris ib</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15925</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris ib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15925</guid>
		<description>Charly (with all due respect) neither Sweden nor Denmark were original members of the EEC.  Italy was a founding member.  Sweden and Denmark have not been instrumental in the European project.  So while you presume to understand the European culture, or even indeed to DEFINE it, Europeans (meaning the founding members of the EEC) obviously don't see it the same way you do.  Sweden and Denmark are late comers who joined in once it was obvious that the EEC was a success.  As, indeed, the Euro is a success.  Despite attempts by people like John Kay to destabilize the Euro.  

Britain attempted to join, was turned down twice, and finally joined to the chagrin of some existing members.  Many see the British merely as sand in the wheels, preventing progress and generally behaving badly because Britain is not at the helm of the project.  Norway is still not a member either of the EEC or of the Euro.  Scandinavia is not really the centre of the European project AT ALL.  The countries who joined opportunistically after it became clear that the EEC was a success neither define the EEC, the Euro, or the goals of the European project.  But then you don't know that because you know nothing about the topic at hand. If you wish to pass comment about what EUROPE is it would be helpful if you were at least a litte familiar with Europe itself.  

Your offensive comment adds NOTHING to the discussion here.  But then that wasn't really your intention, was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charly (with all due respect) neither Sweden nor Denmark were original members of the EEC.  Italy was a founding member.  Sweden and Denmark have not been instrumental in the European project.  So while you presume to understand the European culture, or even indeed to DEFINE it, Europeans (meaning the founding members of the EEC) obviously don&#8217;t see it the same way you do.  Sweden and Denmark are late comers who joined in once it was obvious that the EEC was a success.  As, indeed, the Euro is a success.  Despite attempts by people like John Kay to destabilize the Euro.  </p>
<p>Britain attempted to join, was turned down twice, and finally joined to the chagrin of some existing members.  Many see the British merely as sand in the wheels, preventing progress and generally behaving badly because Britain is not at the helm of the project.  Norway is still not a member either of the EEC or of the Euro.  Scandinavia is not really the centre of the European project AT ALL.  The countries who joined opportunistically after it became clear that the EEC was a success neither define the EEC, the Euro, or the goals of the European project.  But then you don&#8217;t know that because you know nothing about the topic at hand. If you wish to pass comment about what EUROPE is it would be helpful if you were at least a litte familiar with Europe itself.  </p>
<p>Your offensive comment adds NOTHING to the discussion here.  But then that wasn&#8217;t really your intention, was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15924</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15924</guid>
		<description>Sweden and Denmark would still be part of Europe for cultural reasons while Italy is a corrupt version of Tunisia (maybe an exaggeration) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweden and Denmark would still be part of Europe for cultural reasons while Italy is a corrupt version of Tunisia (maybe an exaggeration) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15923</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15923</guid>
		<description>"does Italy prefer being part of Europe"

Of course. But being part of the eurozone and being in the EU are not synonymous, as Sweden, Denmark and the UK illustrate. Indeed of the current 25 EU members only 12 are in the eurozone. If Italy does give up the euro at some point it will be interesting to see how all the acrimony this will produce is handled, by I am certainly not suggesting that Italy will leave the EU, this is not the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;does Italy prefer being part of Europe&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course. But being part of the eurozone and being in the EU are not synonymous, as Sweden, Denmark and the UK illustrate. Indeed of the current 25 EU members only 12 are in the eurozone. If Italy does give up the euro at some point it will be interesting to see how all the acrimony this will produce is handled, by I am certainly not suggesting that Italy will leave the EU, this is not the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4degreesnorth</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/italy-and-the-eurozone/#comment-15922</link>
		<dc:creator>4degreesnorth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2674#comment-15922</guid>
		<description>Now has anyone else got any further points on Italy they would like to take up?

Actually, yes, but real short. When I was discussing Italy's probability of entry into the Euro with Italian official back in the mid 1990s, one very smart young official told me something like the following: we can discuss the economics forever and never agree. But we should always remember that what this boils down to is, does Italy prefer being part of Europe or would it like to join north-africa (no racist pun intended here). I saw this as a profound truth and this led to my greatest forecasting success in many years. Perhaps, we should still look at this issue along the same lines, not least because the guy in charge is the same guy as in the mid-nineties, and in fact succeeded the same incompetent chap (remember Krugman: there is a difference between runnng a country and running a company) as in the mid-nineties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now has anyone else got any further points on Italy they would like to take up?</p>
<p>Actually, yes, but real short. When I was discussing Italy&#8217;s probability of entry into the Euro with Italian official back in the mid 1990s, one very smart young official told me something like the following: we can discuss the economics forever and never agree. But we should always remember that what this boils down to is, does Italy prefer being part of Europe or would it like to join north-africa (no racist pun intended here). I saw this as a profound truth and this led to my greatest forecasting success in many years. Perhaps, we should still look at this issue along the same lines, not least because the guy in charge is the same guy as in the mid-nineties, and in fact succeeded the same incompetent chap (remember Krugman: there is a difference between runnng a country and running a company) as in the mid-nineties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
