<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Trade With EU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/economics-and-demography/china-trade-with-eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/china-trade-with-eu/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/china-trade-with-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-8995</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=1518#comment-8995</guid>
		<description>Interesting data. A few points. It shows again that trade results in winners and losers, in Europe and in the United States. What i&#039;m missing is the overall picture of trade with China, which i think is still positive. I see essentially nothing wrong with running a trade deficit with China. In fact i can see something very positive about the current situation. While rich countries are running a deficit with China, that last country is absorbing imports in massive amounts from still poorer countries in Africa (oil...) and Latin-America (GMO soya from Argentina). All these countries are getting a notch up on the development ladder this way, and it would be a bad thing if protectionist pressures in Western countries would crash the whole system.
And then there is France. Ah, it&#039;s exports are up thanks to Airbus. Mmmm. I&#039;m smelling unfair trade practices here (government involvement), the kind of practices we use to accuse China of. Oh, the irony. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting data. A few points. It shows again that trade results in winners and losers, in Europe and in the United States. What i&#8217;m missing is the overall picture of trade with China, which i think is still positive. I see essentially nothing wrong with running a trade deficit with China. In fact i can see something very positive about the current situation. While rich countries are running a deficit with China, that last country is absorbing imports in massive amounts from still poorer countries in Africa (oil&#8230;) and Latin-America (GMO soya from Argentina). All these countries are getting a notch up on the development ladder this way, and it would be a bad thing if protectionist pressures in Western countries would crash the whole system.<br />
And then there is France. Ah, it&#8217;s exports are up thanks to Airbus. Mmmm. I&#8217;m smelling unfair trade practices here (government involvement), the kind of practices we use to accuse China of. Oh, the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teme</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/china-trade-with-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-8994</link>
		<dc:creator>teme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=1518#comment-8994</guid>
		<description>Good post. I do think lot of the change is due to the fact that China has a currency peg to USD, so while the dollar has fallen so has Remnibi (sic?).

And according to latest first quarter data, January to March 2005 Finland doesn&#039;t have a trade surplus with China anymore. Chinese imports at the period were 556 million euros, or 5.2% of total imports, with y/y growth of 46%. Finnish exports to China were 403, 3.3%, +3% respectfully. To put the figures in perspective 1% of Finnish GDP is something like 1.4 billion euros. Overall, Finland still has a hefty surplus (1.6 billion in first quarter) but unsuprisingly exports to USA are down 32% which I take as further evidence that this is mainly about Euro. Correspondingly, with Euro now lower we should expect the Chinese deficit to lower too for the whole euro zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I do think lot of the change is due to the fact that China has a currency peg to USD, so while the dollar has fallen so has Remnibi (sic?).</p>
<p>And according to latest first quarter data, January to March 2005 Finland doesn&#8217;t have a trade surplus with China anymore. Chinese imports at the period were 556 million euros, or 5.2% of total imports, with y/y growth of 46%. Finnish exports to China were 403, 3.3%, +3% respectfully. To put the figures in perspective 1% of Finnish GDP is something like 1.4 billion euros. Overall, Finland still has a hefty surplus (1.6 billion in first quarter) but unsuprisingly exports to USA are down 32% which I take as further evidence that this is mainly about Euro. Correspondingly, with Euro now lower we should expect the Chinese deficit to lower too for the whole euro zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/china-trade-with-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-8993</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=1518#comment-8993</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say Finland has a trade surplus with China so much as Nokia has one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say Finland has a trade surplus with China so much as Nokia has one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

