<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanley Kurtz&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/culture/stanley-kurtz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/culture/stanley-kurtz/</link>
	<description>European Opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/culture/stanley-kurtz/#comment-14638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2549#comment-14638</guid>
		<description>Actually, Kurtz is quite brilliant in his analysis.  The fact is, there is no good argument for societies that wish to remain stable to accept(advocate)anything but marriage between one man and one woman, and to discourage all other forms of sexual union.  Check out this article. http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12266&#038;R=ECBA25579

Just because we can conceive a thing, doesn't mean it's the thing to do.  Tolerance does not mean advocacy.  We tolerate drunks, but that doesn't mean we should put a societal stamp of approval on being a drunk.  Gays have yet to prove that their choice is biologically determined, or socially desirable.  History, biology and logic mitigate against advocacy.  I can love a drunk while at the same time, reject his behavior.  Homosexuality can only be objectively defined as a behavior, a behavior that cuts a third off the lifespan of SanFrancisco's practicing gay men.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Kurtz is quite brilliant in his analysis.  The fact is, there is no good argument for societies that wish to remain stable to accept(advocate)anything but marriage between one man and one woman, and to discourage all other forms of sexual union.  Check out this article. <a href="http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12266&#038;R=ECBA25579" rel="nofollow">http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12266&#038;R=ECBA25579</a></p>
<p>Just because we can conceive a thing, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the thing to do.  Tolerance does not mean advocacy.  We tolerate drunks, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we should put a societal stamp of approval on being a drunk.  Gays have yet to prove that their choice is biologically determined, or socially desirable.  History, biology and logic mitigate against advocacy.  I can love a drunk while at the same time, reject his behavior.  Homosexuality can only be objectively defined as a behavior, a behavior that cuts a third off the lifespan of SanFrancisco&#8217;s practicing gay men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amsterdamsky</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/culture/stanley-kurtz/#comment-14637</link>
		<dc:creator>Amsterdamsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 12:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2549#comment-14637</guid>
		<description>I have NO problem with gay marriage but I DO have a problem with gays raising children.  I had a baby boomer slut for a mother and no father and always had to explain that the asshole currently shaggin my mother was not my father.  I can't imagine expaining that the guy cornholing my dad is not my dad either.  The fundies might be right on this issue alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have NO problem with gay marriage but I DO have a problem with gays raising children.  I had a baby boomer slut for a mother and no father and always had to explain that the asshole currently shaggin my mother was not my father.  I can&#8217;t imagine expaining that the guy cornholing my dad is not my dad either.  The fundies might be right on this issue alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dutchmarbel</title>
		<link>http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/culture/stanley-kurtz/#comment-14636</link>
		<dc:creator>dutchmarbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/?p=2549#comment-14636</guid>
		<description>One of the nicer things in our news is about a stork population in one of our animal parcs. The population consists of 9 males and 7 females - and they found that three couples decided to go for same-gender houshoulds :)
Two male couples and one female couples started brooding on eggs and taking care of the young when the eggs hatched.
There is no difference in upbringing between the homosexual and heterosexual couples :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the nicer things in our news is about a stork population in one of our animal parcs. The population consists of 9 males and 7 females - and they found that three couples decided to go for same-gender houshoulds <img src='http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Two male couples and one female couples started brooding on eggs and taking care of the young when the eggs hatched.<br />
There is no difference in upbringing between the homosexual and heterosexual couples <img src='http://fistfulofeuros.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
