Another Lesson In How Not To Go About Things From The EU Commission

The present generation of European leaders will doubtless be remembered for many things, but somewhere high up there on the list will be the appauling sense of bad-timing they seem to have when making critical announcements. The confusion caused by certain ill-considered remarks from Angela Merkel about how private sectors bondholders would need to participate in future EU bailout processes is evidently one good example. Another, without doubt is going to be the decision by EU Commissioner Olli Rehn to appear before the world’s press today (yes, today of all days, one day after the sensitive announcement of the Irish Bank Bail-out plan and the decision to create the European Financial Mechanism), and inform the assembled throngs that as far as the EU Commission could see Spain will not be sticking to its 6% of GDP fiscal deficit committment next year, simply because according to EU calculations the deficit is going to be 6.4% – unless, of course – there is another round of fiscal reduction measures.

I think Spanish has a suitable word for this kind of persistent badtiming: “gafé”. But the thing is, if Europe’s leaders insist on continually showing the markets just how “gafé” they all are, then we are never going to find our way out of this hole we have all dug for ourselves.

And so it was, that by 16:30 this afternoon the yield on 10 year Spanish bonds hit 5.5% (up from around 5.2 at Friday’s close), and the spread over equivalent German Bunds hit a Euro-era record high of 273 basis points. These sort of numbers were totally unimaginable at the start of 2010.

The root of the problem comes from the fact that the EU Commission had identified today as the day when their economic forecasts for national economies were to be published, and so it was. As part of the forecast the commission fractionally lowered its 2011 growth outlook for Spain, to 0.7% from an earlier expectation of 0.8%. Hardly earth-shattering news, and not normally the sort of thing to send bond yields off into a “death spiral”, but given the times we live in, markets are extraordinarily sensitive to any such revision. In fact, a downward revision of 0.1 percentage point is well within the bounds of any reasonable margin of error, and no one really has the foggiest idea of what Spanish growth will actually look like next year beyond the most approximate of approximate guesses. This is because the degree of uncertainty is unusually high in the external environment, and the impact of the very strong fiscal correction that is planned (from this years 9.2% deficit, to next years 6% one) is very hard to evaluate. Personally I think it will be very hard for Spain to get positive GDP growth at all next year given all we are seeing, but I certainly don’t want to engage in a Dutch auction with the Spanish authorities on this point.

But in fact the potential difficulties for Spain to achieve the 6% target for 2011 were already reasonably well known. I had already written about it in this post, were I pointed out the difficulty Spain’s regional and local governments were having this year in meeting targets, and how important it was going to be to stick by the letter of next years budget plan if the administration did not wish to face the wrath of the markets.

My points were backed up the day after by Bank of Spain Governor Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordonez, who told a Spanish parliamentary committee that:

“Recent budget data point to the achievement of objectives for 2010, at least for the central government…. but (as far as the regional governments go) my impression is that the measures [they’ve announced] are far from sufficient”

The Bank of Spain governor reinforced this point by adding that in a highly decentralized Spain, where the central government directly controls less than a third of spending, and lacks sufficient means to supervise the fiscal policies of regional and local administrations, it was extremely difficult for the central government to get an exact result. His opinion was that these august bodies be required to publish budget data in a more timely fashion and be given an annual spending ceiling. In fact, these days the Spanish government cannot afford to ignore what the Governor of its Central Bank says, and so the administration has gone some way to putting such controls in place, but whether they are sufficient to do the job or not still remains to be seen.

Mafo’s point was backed up later the same week by former Bank of Spain deputy governor and current IMF Official José Viñals, who stated “Spain should be willing to carry out additional fiscal adjustments to achieve a budget deficit of 6 percent of gross domestic product by 2011 because markets have “zero tolerance” for failure to meet stated targets.”

So these issues are already known, Spain may well need to formulate a plan “B” if the governments hand is forced, but it was a pity to unsettle the markets just one more time by raising them again precisely today.

Not everything in the report was bad news for Spain, however, since the commission did improve its forecast for this year. The EU now expects the country’s GDP to contract by 0.2% in 2010, compared with the 0.4% contraction it had projected in the spring forecast, giving a little more power to the elbow of a struggling Elena Salgado who has recently been belabouring the point that her forecasts are better than those of the EU and the IMF. But next year will be the “test of fire” on this front, since it is starting next year that all those rather optimistic expectations on domestic consumption start to lock-in.

Having said that, the EU now predicts that annual average unemployment will rise again next year, and hit 20.2% (above Salgado’s forcecast). In fact this may well be an underestimate, since the September figure was 20.8%, and at the present time unemployment is still rising, and not falling. Indeed Olli Rehn himself stressed that there were “significant but balanced risks to the baseline scenario.” And in particular he pointed out that further drops in house prices could lead to a “deeper-than-expected adjustment in construction, dent household wealth and sap consumer confidence.” And yet that is just what Spain seems to continue to be facing, a slow drop-by-drop downward trickle in house prices.

So what can the Spanish government do to stop the rot? Basically at this point very little. The ammunition has nearly all been fired off, and most of it has been wasted. And yet one more time we all seem to be in agreement. When asked what Spain and Portugal should do to stop the so-called contagion, I was quoted by the Financial Times as saying: “Not do anything wrong….. The only thing you can advise these people to do at this stage is to be absolutely frank and stick absolutely to what they say.” “From this point on, the more you do fiscal austerity, the more you contract and the less you can pay”.

The following day Manuel Campa, Spain’s deputy finance minister for the economy was quoted by Bloomberg in a similar vein as saying that the best thing “to generate credibility in the Spanish economy is to execute the measures we have announced at the time and in the way they were announced, and that implies not taking additional measures.”

And as luck would have it Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordonez was back before the Spanish senate the following day (his timing, unlike that of Olli Rehn, seems to be impeccable), telling all those senators that “We have to convince people that we’re going to do exactly what we said we were going to do.” Seems logical, doesn’t it, I mean whyever would they imagine you might not do what you say you are going to do? Whatever put that wicked thought in their heads?

And Mafo was also on this occasion perfectly frank about the growth situation: “The outlook for a gradual recovery is surrounded by uncertainties,” he told the senators.”In an environment where financing conditions will foreseeably remain restrictive and in which the public and the private sector have a pressing need to clean up their financial position, we can expect the pace of recovery in household consumption to slow versus the first half of the year.”

I couldn’t have put it better myself.

So, summing up. Spain is suffering from the serious restrictions imposed on trying to make a major economic correction while participating in a monetary union (Paul Krugman is once more making similar points in today’s New York Times). In particular this means that not only does the country not have a currency to devalue, it does not have a central bank with capacity to print money and buy its bonds. It also has a very substantial exposure in terms of the external position (ie debt) that makes it dependent on international financial markets for funding in a way that means that the extremely low interest rates that are on offer at the ECB are not really (beyond some limited non standard liquidity measures) passed on to the countries banks, her citizens, her companies or her government.

Spain has the benefits of neither expansionary fiscal or monetary tools in the midst of a huge output slump, where the underlying contractionary tendencies in the economy are still substantial. Given all of this, and given that Spain’s leaders have at last shown some signs that they are aware of the seriousness of the situation that faces the country, I think it is being cruel beyond belief to haggle over whether the deficit next year will be 6% or 6.4%, let alone send Spanish bond values into a suicidal downward spiral that risks destroying what is still left of the countries banks over the issue.

Spain needs to stick to its deficit reduction targets, but it also needs more help from those who are running the system by which it is trapped and which it is struggling hard to defend. Pile the pressure on and the country is only going to crack. What Spain needs is to get back to growth, and to put people back to work, then the deficit problems will sort themselves out almost on their own. And in this sense it is the authors of the latest EU forecast, and not those who run the Spanish administration who are the unrealistic ones. Spain is in a corner which it can’t get out of alone. She needs help, and that help is going to have to come from the top.

As Krugman says:

If Spain still had its own currency, like the United States — or like Britain, which shares some of the same characteristics — it could have let that currency fall, making its industry competitive again. But with Spain on the euro, that option isn’t available. Instead, Spain must achieve “internal devaluation”: it must cut wages and prices until its costs are back in line with its neighbors.

And internal devaluation is an ugly affair. For one thing, it’s slow: it normally take years of high unemployment to push wages down. Beyond that, falling wages mean falling incomes, while debt stays the same. So internal devaluation worsens the private sector’s debt problems.

Internal devaluation is coming, there is now no avoiding it. When I advanced the idea for Spain some three years ago it wasn’t some sort of contribution to a collective brainstorming session, it wasn’t just one option on offer together with a whole series of others. What I was saying was if we don’t go down this path then would would inevitably end up where we are now. But as Krugman points out, seeing it through means the private sector debt problem will only deteriorate, which is why we need help, to share the burden. The other alternative, of seeing the Euro fall apart, is in the interests of no one. Not even the Germans, who would soon see the current record growth in their exports shifted into reverse gear as the new DeutscheMark was quoted at values (as is happening to the Japanese yen right now) which robbed the country of all semblance of competitiveness.

Well, today we have a new government in Catalonia. So maybe its time to change. Maybe finally we could now start to address the problems of the Spanish economy head-on, and put the future of the country on a sound and sustainable footing. It’s certainly worth a try, and, at least, as the English saying goes: where there’s life, there’s hope.

This entry was posted in A Fistful Of Euros, Economics: Country briefings, Economics: Currencies by Edward Hugh. Bookmark the permalink.

About Edward Hugh

Edward 'the bonobo is a Catalan economist of British extraction. After being born, brought-up and educated in the United Kingdom, Edward subsequently settled in Barcelona where he has now lived for over 15 years. As a consequence Edward considers himself to be "Catalan by adoption". He has also to some extent been "adopted by Catalonia", since throughout the current economic crisis he has been a constant voice on TV, radio and in the press arguing in favor of the need for some kind of internal devaluation if Spain wants to stay inside the Euro. By inclination he is a macro economist, but his obsession with trying to understand the economic impact of demographic changes has often taken him far from home, off and away from the more tranquil and placid pastures of the dismal science, into the bracken and thicket of demography, anthropology, biology, sociology and systems theory. All of which has lead him to ask himself whether Thomas Wolfe was not in fact right when he asserted that the fact of the matter is "you can never go home again".

15 thoughts on “Another Lesson In How Not To Go About Things From The EU Commission

  1. I checked the dictionary, there is not such word as “gafé” in spanish. I think you got that wrong. Take the accent away and we can talk about it.

    More or less happens with the rest of the article, if check the facts they are not right. Is all a matter of accent placement with Edward.

    Here is spanish public debt as of second quarter 2010:

    Central Administration: -43% GDP
    Local governments: 9.9% GDP
    Cities and mayors: 3.5% GDP

    Add it up and tell me if it is worst than Germany’s, France’s, Italy’s, Belgium’s, Irelands’s, Greece’s,… In fact, please tell me who has it better.

    Now please add GDP growth of any country in europe since lets say 2007 and tell me if Germany, France, UK, Italy …. anyone, leaves Spain behind. The answer is no or not by much.

    These are facts from reality, as of anything starting from the line that separates now with the future,…. anything you say is … fiction.

  2. @Jeronimo: What you say about the Spanish public debt in relation to other Euro countries is correct, but as I understand the problem it is not so much the level of debt, but rather how it is financed that is of concern. Countries like Germany, Italy and Belgium have higher domestic savings which makes them less dependent on international capital markets and therefore less vulnerable in the current situation.

  3. It seems clear that the Spanish government’s debts (whatever their size) and however they are to be be financed, are problems that have arisen because of Spain’s membership of the Euro. These problems can probably be pushed away in the short or even medium term. However they are side issues . The important question is how Spain is going to restore growth and reduce unemployment. It seems to me that internal devaluation is a do-nothing policy which could last for decades. I would hope that the Spanish people would not accept such a policy and would demand action.

    At the moment though, I cant see any serious proposals about how growth could be restored. All parties are failing the electorate by the absence of any concrete proposals. I don’t share Edward’s optimism that a change of government in Catalonia will bring about changes.

    Its vital to move beyond pointless arguments about about the comparative level of debt and how to finance it. If Spain is to remain in the Euro, and avoid slow death by internal- devaluation, what else could restore growth? Edward mentions the need for external help. But what form would this take? A boost to the banking system to clear all the dead loans in the housing sector? A temporary exit from the Euro with all guarantees met by some sort of EU fund? It seems to me these are the most important questions to ask right now.

  4. Balticman,

    Well, that is the 6 million dollar question. But it doesn’t only apply to Spain.
    How to restore growth? To start with there is a lot of spare capacity; that is something good if you need growth. Then there is the absurd fact of trying that every country in europe should become a little exporting Germany. This is the main problem, people that not only think that that is possible but also think that is the only solution. This an eye opening reading that I highly recommend:

    The solutions are not local but global. For some countries to increase their exports other countries have to increase their internal markets, that is the only way out. And it is a win-win situation.

    PS: Really laughable the story about local elections in the catalan region. The winner is a nationalist party. There are 4 xenophobes from a freaky party for the first time in the new parliament, and Edward sees this as a positive development. I am just speechless.

  5. Pingback: Anonymous

  6. Jeronimo – Thanks for the link. It seems to me that the arguments put forward by the CER are basically the same as Edward has been putting forward over the last couple of years. Yes, there are massive imbalances within the Euro zone. Yes, Germany should “restructure” and increase domestic demand. The problem, is that there is no sign of this happening. If anything German policy seems at the moment to offer no alternatives to a neo-DM zone. And what does Spain do in the meantime ?

    The utter failure of Spain’s political class to articulate an alternative and to move beyond a supine wait and see approach is very disappointing. Of course they can try and work behind the scenes and lobby for a change in German policy, but is this enough? The problem of global imbalances is also relevant here. We are still in a period of waiting to see if China will increase domestic demand. In the meantime perhaps the Spanish government could introduce a few supply side reforms to try and improve the long term growth rate. More likely we will see nothing attempted.

  7. Pingback: Today’s Option Blogs December 1, 2010 | SurlyTrader

  8. Balticman,

    Sorry but we must have been reading a different Edward. The one I read one day says that property price levels are too high, and that is bad, and the next says that property prices are going down, and that is also bad. The Edward I read is one of incoherence.
    What is Spain doing? For starters it has controlled its public debt during the way up, during the decade it was growing at double the pace of europe. It is now reducing its foreign account deficit from -10% a year ago to -5% now. Spain and Germany are the only two OECD countries that have sustained their share of trade on the global economy these two years. Not in vain Spain’s voting rights have recently been increased in IMF to reflect the weight of its economy from 1.4% to 2%. UK, France, Italy,… had it lowered. China, India, Brasil, Russia had it risen, of course, as well as Spain.


    Yes I know you would trust reading coffee stains or tea leaves or the insides of a chicken to acquire data. The statistics being given here come from Eurostat, the IMF and the World Bank, but who are they to have data different to yours?

  9. This has been planned for a long time and dropping the Euro is just one part. The other is to integrate the resouces of the periphery asap.

    Never waste a good crisis!

    Going to be an interesting depression!

  10. Spain’s problems are a comnibation of

    Low Growth Forecast
    High Public Deficit
    Falling Housing Market
    Banks Exposure to Portuguese Debt
    Banks Assets (they own many foreclosed houses) detoriating
    High Unemployment
    Low recent PMI numbers indicating contraction

    Conclusion: The market is selling of Spain’s debt. After the ECB actions ast week, Spain’s yield is still around 5.2%

    The bond market is telling you something.

  11. -Edward forecasted not Low growth but contraction, therefore Spain is beating forecasts growthwise.
    -Spanish deficit in 2010 is within the average in Europe. It was not so in 2009 because of voluntary stimulus measures that other countries did not apply. Now they have been suspended.
    -Housing market still moves 500.000 properties a year, well in line with spanish population and european averages.
    -Spanish Banks have an Exposure to Portuguese debt of less than 1% of their assets. Other economies have much larger exposures to foreign debt markets.
    -Spanish Banks Assets are as robust as any. Actually better than the average. You just have to acknowlege the growth of spanish banks in the international scene in the last two years comparing with british, german, french,…. banks.
    -Despite 20% unemployment there is more people working today in Spain as ann absolute figure and as a percentage of people above the age of 16 than there were when spanish unemployment was 10%. The reason is the explosive growth of the working population through immigration and through incorporation of women to the market.
    -PMI figures are in a two year high.
    -Spain uses a lower percentage of its GDP to pay its debt than France, Germany, Italy, UK,…

    The markets almost always end being right, but that does not mean they are right all the time.

    Spanish bonds are also immerse and a continent wide battle that regards the euro and its credibility as a currency. That also has its implications. Europe has to find a way to sustain the credibility of the euro as an international currency.

  12. Pingback: Edward Hugh and A Fistful of Euros

Comments are closed.